China 2013 physical GDP per capita was

about 52% of the US figure! Physical GDP excludes the service sector that accounts for about 80% of the US GDP.

所有跟帖： 

• 這樣exclude有意思嗎?你怎麽不exclude窮人來算?LOL -golflover- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:20:14

• LOL! -panlm_- ♀ (207 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:28:08

• 那是，不然怎麽可能河北一個小官就一貪汙一個億。 -mapell22- ♀ (123 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:30:31

• 不是被抓了嗎？ -相對強度- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:45:52

• 隻能說明中國人均用電量隻有美國的四分之一,還差得遠呢 -golflover- ♂ (77 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:31:17

• This time, you get right. -panlm_- ♀ (58 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:38:15

• do you have data to back your point -golflover- ♂ (62 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:43:50

• China physical GDP per capita in 2013 -panlm_- ♀ (31 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:45:27

• was asking about electricity efficiency -golflover- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:46:36

• electricity is mainly used in industry and agriculture, -panlm_- ♀ (202 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:49:43

• you admit you are comparing apple with orange -golflover- ♂ (58 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:53:37

• No. I am telling the truth. -panlm_- ♀ (347 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:57:15

• 轉移話題了,bye -golflover- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 09:59:25

• 頂！ panlm_ 的帖子，有理有節，比普世不知高明多少。 -相對強度- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 10:28:41

• 喂，LZ的原貼是中國和印度比耶。到您這裏，咋變成和美國比了？您還說人家“轉移話題”，您咋不把美國的和印度的比一比涅？ -吃素的狼- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/23/2014 postreply 21:36:29