if i were to be involved in a car accident, i wish the other car were -
1) smaller
2) lighter
3) has a robust energy absorption feature
4) its load weighes a little
the least wanted - a full size truck or one in that category or up.
if i were to be involved in a car accident, i wish the other car were -
1) smaller
2) lighter
3) has a robust energy absorption feature
4) its load weighes a little
the least wanted - a full size truck or one in that category or up.
• 那個問題是一啃,大家都跳 -修車工- ♂ (169 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 11:13:27
• 我的問題,倆前題:兩車同重,兩車撞牆安全性相同,不同的僅僅是車的大小 -TBz- ♂ (53 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 15:01:44
• 不用說, 你是明知故問. LOL -老生長談- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 15:51:08
• 我坦白 -TBz- ♂ (128 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 20:27:18
• 說老實話,工程上這個是沒有足夠條件做決定 -soccer88- ♂ (355 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 22:17:58
• 按實際工程設計和製造的情況下,是可以分析估算的。 -TBz- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 22:42:34
• 如果都是用Ultra high-strength steels (as 780 MPa materials and above) -soccer88- ♂ (181 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 22:49:08
• 與材料沒太大關係。 -TBz- ♂ (165 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 23:01:15
• 不是,同樣的衝擊,不同材料變形不一樣 -soccer88- ♂ (64 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 23:06:56
• 已經說了,兩車同重,撞剛體結果相同。 -TBz- ♂ (128 bytes) () 09/06/2017 postreply 23:28:17
• 就是僥幸; -soccer88- ♂ (558 bytes) () 09/07/2017 postreply 00:15:55
• 我的條件一開始就是清晰的,從來沒有變過。 -TBz- ♂ (91 bytes) () 09/07/2017 postreply 15:11:43