MDX 操控性好於X5? 你的操控性是如何定義的?看到的車評多數覺得操控性是MDX的弱點。

來源: southmountainer 2015-11-20 08:14:41 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (160391 bytes)
回答: 說說2015 MDX 和 GX460 使用體會History20082015-11-19 12:15:26

http://www.thecarconnection.com/car-compare-results/acura_mdx_2016-vs-bmw_x5-series_2015

Compare 2016 Acura MDX vs 2015 BMW X5

2016 Acura MDXChange
 
2015 BMW X5Change
 
+ Add a Car
2016 Acura MDXChange
 
2015 BMW X5Change
 
+ Add a Car
Selected Style FWD 4-Door
Switch Style
RWD 4-Door sDrive35i
Switch Style
 
Pricing
Invoice Price  
Manufacturer Suggested Retail Price  
Monthly Payment Estimate  
Dealer Price Quotes Get Your Price Get Your Price  
The Car Connection's Take
TCC Rating
8.6
TCC RATING
 
 
?
Read Our Full Review
8.4
TCC RATING
 
 
?
Read Our Full Review
 
TCC's Bottom Line The 2016 Acura MDX remains one of the best luxury three-row SUVs, but the benefits of its new nine-speed automatic are unclear. The 2015 BMW X5 is a handsome, capable, tech-filled vehicle for the shopper who wants a luxury SUV.  
TCC Likes  
TCC Dislikes  
Fuel Economy
Fuel Economy - City 19 mpg 19 mpg  
Fuel Economy - Highway 27 mpg 27 mpg  
Vehicle
EPA Classification Small Sport Utility Vehicles 2WD Standard Sport Utility Vehicles 2WD  
Interior Dimensions
Front Leg Room (in) 41.5 40.4  
Passenger Volume (ft³) 132.3 -  
Third Head Room (in) 35.6 -  
Front Hip Room (in) 59 -  
Third Shoulder Room (in) 54.7 -  
Second Leg Room (in) 36.5 36.6  
Front Head Room (in) 38.1 40.5  
Passenger Capacity 7 5  
Second Hip Room (in) 57.8 -  
Front Shoulder Room (in) 61.1 60.5  
Third Leg Room (in) 27.4 -  
Second Head Room (in) 38.3 38.8  
Third Hip Room (in) 40.6 -  
Second Shoulder Room (in) 59.1 58.3  
Exterior Dimensions
Min Ground Clearance (in) 5.6 -  
Length, Overall (in) 193.6 191.1  
Height, Overall (in) 67.6 68.5  
Track Width, Rear (in) 66.3 65  
Wheelbase (in) 111 115.5  
Width, Max w/o mirrors (in) 77.2 76.1  
Track Width, Front (in) 66.3 64.7  
Cargo Area Dimensions
Cargo Volume to Seat 2 (ft³) 38.4 22.9  
Cargo Volume to Seat 1 (ft³) 68.4 66  
Cargo Volume to Seat 3 (ft³) 15 22.9  
Brakes
Rear Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) 13 12.6  
Rear Drum Diam x Width (in) NA NA  
Disc - Front (Yes or ) Yes Yes  
Front Brake Rotor Diam x Thickness (in) 12.6 13.7  
Drum - Rear (Yes or ) NA NA  
Brake ABS System 4-Wheel 4-Wheel  
Disc - Rear (Yes or ) Yes Yes  
Fuel Tank
Fuel Tank Capacity, Approx (gal) 19.5 22.4  
Steering
Turning Diameter - Curb to Curb (ft) 38.7 41.7  
Steering Type Rack-Pinion Rack-Pinion  
Tires
Front Tire Size P245/60HR18 P255/55HR18  
Spare Tire Size NA NA  
Front Tire Order Code NA NA  
Spare Tire Order Code NA NA  
Rear Tire Size P245/60HR18 P255/55HR18  
Rear Tire Order Code NA NA  
Trailering
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) 3500 5952  
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Trailer Wt. (lbs) 3500 5952  
Maximum Trailering Capacity (lbs) 3500 5952  
Dead Weight Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) 350 595  
Wt Distributing Hitch - Max Tongue Wt. (lbs) 525 893  
Weight Information
Base Curb Weight (lbs) 3960 4680  
Wheels
Spare Wheel Size (in) NA NA  
Rear Wheel Material Aluminum Aluminum  
Rear Wheel Size (in) 18 X 8 18 X 8.5  
Front Wheel Material Aluminum Aluminum  
Spare Wheel Material NA NA  
Front Wheel Size (in) 18 X 8 18 X 8.5  
Electrical
Maximum Alternator Capacity (amps) 150 210  
Engine
SAE Net Torque @ RPM 267 @ 4700 300 @ 1200  
Engine Order Code NA NA  
Displacement 3.5 L/212 3.0 L/182  
SAE Net Horsepower @ RPM 290 @ 6200 300 @ 5800  
Engine Type Premium Unleaded V-6 Intercooled Turbo Premium Unleaded I-6  
Fuel System Direct Gasoline Injection Direct Gasoline Injection  
Mileage
Fuel Economy Est-Combined (MPG) 22 22  
EPA Fuel Economy Est - Hwy (MPG) 27 27  
EPA Fuel Economy Est - City (MPG) 19 19  
Transmission
Sixth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.81 1.00  
First Gear Ratio (:1) 4.71 4.71  
Eighth Gear Ratio (:1) 0.58 0.67  
Final Drive Axle Ratio (:1) 4.33 3.15  
Third Gear Ratio (:1) 1.91 2.11  
Trans Type 9 8  
Drivetrain Front Wheel Drive Rear Wheel Drive  
Fifth Gear Ratio (:1) 1.00 1.29  
Trans Description Cont. Again NA NA  
Seventh Gear Ratio (:1) 0.70 0.84  
Reverse Ratio (:1) 3.83 3.30  
Second Gear Ratio (:1) 2.84 3.14  
Trans Order Code NA 205  
Fourth Gear Ratio (:1) 1.38 1.67  
Trans Description Cont. Automatic w/OD Automatic w/OD  
Summary
Vehicle Name Acura MDX BMW X5  
Body Style Sport Utility Sport Utility  
Suspension
Suspension Type - Front (Cont.) Strut Double Wishbone  
Suspension Type - Rear Multi-Link Multi-Link  
Suspension Type - Rear (Cont.) Multi-Link Multi-Link  
Suspension Type - Front Strut Double Wishbone  
Emissions
Tons/yr of CO2 Emissions @ 15K mi/year 8.1 (Est) 8.0 (Est)  
Crash Test Ratings
Overall Rating
 
 
 
Overall Frontal Barrier Crash Rating
 
 
 
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Driver
 
 
 
Frontal Barrier Crash Rating Passenger
 
 
 
Overall Side Crash Rating
 
 
 
Side Barrier Rating
 
 
 
Side Barrier Rating Driver
 
 
 
Side Barrier Rating Passenger Rear Seat
 
 
 
Side Pole Rating Driver Front Seat
 
 
 
Combined Side Rating Front Seat
 
 
 
Combined Side Rating Rear Seat
 
 
 
Rollover Rating
 
 

 

 

所有跟帖: 

個人感覺吧,就是彎路轉彎的延遲感和加速的反應。X5的操控感覺是好一點,但是路麵的感覺太硬了。 -History2008- 給 History2008 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/20/2015 postreply 09:13:07

X5和MDX俺都特地比試過。X5操控和MDX不是一個檔次。你可能把舒適性和操控性混為一談了。 -reader007- 給 reader007 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/20/2015 postreply 17:02:09

行家。以前也有個哥們比過,結果他把油門鬆緊,反向盤力度和懸掛軟硬的個人習慣 -日理萬機- 給 日理萬機 發送悄悄話 (272 bytes) () 11/20/2015 postreply 17:35:33

Too good to be true for a Honda Accord chassis and Honda doesn't -bridge008- 給 bridge008 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/20/2015 postreply 12:33:16

lol -日理萬機- 給 日理萬機 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/20/2015 postreply 17:35:57

這些人評法拉第很多肯定0分 -soccer88- 給 soccer88 發送悄悄話 soccer88 的博客首頁 (2097 bytes) () 11/20/2015 postreply 17:42:15

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”