Haven't you ever been taught never use a very same term to represent completely things?
In that scenario, you firstly said the Vf was the final velocity, then at the same time you used the same Vf for something else totally different without saying anything. How can you expect people read your mind? Isn't it misleading?
let me ask one thing
所有跟帖:
•
Let me tell you
-CW62-
♂
(608 bytes)
()
10/07/2014 postreply
17:33:14
•
This subject is meaningless to begin with
-MoonRiverMe-
♂
(329 bytes)
()
10/07/2014 postreply
19:08:08
•
別忙著下結論。車禍受傷是因為保險帶沒拉住人,氣囊沒擋住頭,還是車身形變引起的?我看後者可能性大些。那樣的話,經撞是很重要的。
-周老大-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
10/07/2014 postreply
21:19:05
•
What a funny logic
-CW62-
♂
(694 bytes)
()
10/08/2014 postreply
07:14:35
•
you don't even know under what condition CM holds true
-MoonRiverMe-
♂
(515 bytes)
()
10/08/2014 postreply
16:37:57
•
Are you serious?
-CW62-
♂
(447 bytes)
()
10/09/2014 postreply
07:42:18