I personally prefer mechanical sytem.

來源: wolfmanii 於 2010-02-22 10:09:46 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (524 bytes)
回答: Brake Override的背後 由 Lyedge 於 2010-02-21 14:05:16

Leaving too much stuff controlled by computer always bothers me.

Germain made vehicles are notorious in this area. If everything works, it is a beauty. But if one thing is wrong, who knows how many sensor/computer chips need to be checked/replaced?

I would reather keep the critical part, such
as brake, accelerator control depends on mechnical
system (direct control), than outsource it to a computer deciding my life.

But with the current trend in auto industry. I don't think it will happen.

所有跟帖： 

• I second you on this point -biglow- ♂ 給 biglow 發送悄悄話 biglow 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 02/22/2010 postreply 10:29:00

• Cool :) -wolfmanii- ♂ 給 wolfmanii 發送悄悄話 wolfmanii 的博客首頁 (587 bytes) () 02/22/2010 postreply 10:47:26

• 我也傾向機械控製，簡單可靠 -TBz- ♂ 給 TBz 發送悄悄話 TBz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 02/22/2010 postreply 11:30:23

• 成本低，易於維護。 -TBz- ♂ 給 TBz 發送悄悄話 TBz 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 02/22/2010 postreply 11:38:24

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！