小車不安全，IIHS用Accord撞Fit，Camry對撞Yaris，奔馳C撞Smart (圖)

小車不安全，IIHS用Accord撞Fit，Camry對撞Yaris，奔馳C撞Smart “The small cars involved in all three tests - the Toyota Yaris, Honda Fit and Smart ForTwo - had already earned top scores for front impact protection in the Institute's standard front impact test in which cars are crashed into a crushable barrier, not another car. ” “That test simulates two cars of roughly equal size hitting almost head-on.” 就是大車安全，小車不安全。IIHS要救美國車了？？？？可惜俺沒找到大圖，過幾天再看吧。 原文鏈接：http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/14/autos/iihs_small_vs_big/index.htm?postversion=2009041404 http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_33717.aspx

所有跟帖： 

• 真理重複一萬遍還是真理。 -1800800- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:07:00

• 重複一萬遍,什麽都是真理 -coorslight969- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:08:37

• 真的。。。？ -1800800- ♂ (78 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:16:33

• 說到30遍的時候，別人就會說 “這人病的不輕了 -internuts- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 19:20:11

• Audi is here !!!!! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 10:21:59

• 還真好使。下次我也對著我的車嚷幾嗓子：PORSCHE,PORSCHE,PORSCHE! -1800800- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 16:32:54

• Sorry, still Audi... -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/16/2009 postreply 13:35:59

• 重複一萬遍, 沒人還在乎真理 -wer188- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:16:38

• how about Camery vs. Buick or Accord vs. Cadillac? -bassman- ♂ (108 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 17:13:51

• 不明白， 造大車難嗎？好像比容易小車。一切取決與生意。 -北航新保理英子- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 18:30:47

• 話又說回來， 任何時候都有大小車， 除非都開一款車 -北航新保理英子- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 18:43:19

• 應該對超過4米長的車征“威脅他人安全”特別稅 -MOVEOVER- ♂ (110 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 20:55:15

• 那就沒人買車，看肥了誰。 -Grant- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 21:55:52

• 嗯，再對少於3米的征收有礙觀瞻費。。。國家大發了～～ -internuts- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 22:03:35

• No car is safe -cys254- ♂ (132 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 20:56:54

• 裝甲車，蝙蝠俠的車，應該可以保證安全了在一般路況 -我來自火星- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/14/2009 postreply 21:52:15

• 是，關鍵還是要看開車的人 -woth- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:50:38

• Accord 和 Camry 也有欺負被人的機會了，不容易。hehe -ISO- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 10:12:42

• It's not the size of the car, stupid! -once4all09- ♂ (529 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:15:13

• 經濟不景氣，大街上有幾個是開超豪華車的？舉那些特例幹什麽？ --vip-- ♂ (162 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:32:50

• 回經濟不景氣doesn't make your gas guzzler safer -once4all09- ♂ (116 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:38:23

• 你以為你做的那些“研究”比LZ的照片更說明問題嗎？ --vip-- ♂ (65 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:46:11

• What is a "referred journal"??? Lol! -once4all09- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:02:16

• Of course not, the pics appeal to people like urself -once4all09- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:04:57

• 打錯了。refereed --vip-- ♂ (270 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:06:43

• 汽車的安全性能不是隻靠一個迎頭對撞就能測試出來的，要有很多 -woth- ♀ (16 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 11:52:04

• But "一個迎頭對撞" says everything if you are -Audi- ♂ (158 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:05:01

• It is not rocket science -once4all09- ♂ (498 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:15:40

• Then give me an example which a much smaller car -Audi- ♂ (46 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:25:00

• Again, what is more import to you, your car or the life of you a -once4all09- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:32:07

• 又一個“吸能大師”來了！Life for sure...but do you -Audi- ♂ (98 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:37:57

• You don't know why THESE 3 smallish cars were picked -once4all09- ♂ (135 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:43:45

• I tend to agree on this: smaller cheaper cars are -Audi- ♂ (203 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:47:44

• 回複：I tend to agree on this: smaller cheaper cars are -once4all09- ♂ (219 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:56:34

• It is called Statistics. Well, sorry too much for ur IQ! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:11:59

• Look at this carefully, stupid! "In the case of -Audi- ♂ (389 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:43:58

• Let's just leave it at that -once4all09- ♂ (68 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:51:10

• Yes, yours are unfortunately too low! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:53:31

• BTW, do you really know what does "it's not rocket -Audi- ♂ (76 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:56:46

• 回複：汽車的安全性能不是隻靠一個迎頭對撞就能測試出來的，要有很多 -once4all09- ♂ (103 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:01:45

• True! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:08:01

• Hey, it's not rocket science either. -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:09:05

• let me just ask you: In those cases, in which cars -Audi- ♂ (102 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:18:30

• 這個圖片是OFFSET碰撞，大車被撞的部分剛好是另一邊，隻能 -sideshowbob- ♀ (64 bytes) () 04/22/2009 postreply 01:38:20

• Audi and once4a1109 -jgsaron- ♂ (143 bytes) () 04/22/2009 postreply 14:17:04