It is not rocket science

and nobody says physics laws should be rewritten. But you can't analyze the situation with sort of one-dimensional input, in this case, size. For example, is the car designed to crumple on a head-on collision? Do you want the car to be damaged (to absorb the energy) or the driver injured? How many airbags are there and how are they positioned? Independent studies have shown the safety design and build quality of cars are critical in determining the outcomes of these car accidents.

所有跟帖： 

• Then give me an example which a much smaller car -Audi- ♂ (46 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:25:00

• Again, what is more import to you, your car or the life of you a -once4all09- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:32:07

• 又一個“吸能大師”來了！Life for sure...but do you -Audi- ♂ (98 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:37:57

• You don't know why THESE 3 smallish cars were picked -once4all09- ♂ (135 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:43:45

• I tend to agree on this: smaller cheaper cars are -Audi- ♂ (203 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:47:44

• 回複：I tend to agree on this: smaller cheaper cars are -once4all09- ♂ (219 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:56:34

• It is called Statistics. Well, sorry too much for ur IQ! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 13:11:59

• Look at this carefully, stupid! "In the case of -Audi- ♂ (389 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:43:58

• Let's just leave it at that -once4all09- ♂ (68 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:51:10

• Yes, yours are unfortunately too low! -Audi- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:53:31

• BTW, do you really know what does "it's not rocket -Audi- ♂ (76 bytes) () 04/15/2009 postreply 12:56:46