Volvo的AWD是騙人的?

來源: booloolood 2009-02-26 22:13:20 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2003 bytes)
95%/5% power distribution, is it true?

http://www.4x4abc.com/4WD101/volvo.html


How can Volvo claim they have full time AWD even though primarely only two wheels are powered?


The Volvo automatic AWD system has no traditional transfer case. Primary power goes to the front wheels. The rear drive shaft incorporates a viscous coupling (Haldex on the new XC-90) and as long as front and rear axles rotate at the same speed the coupling unit would remain inactive and the rear tires receive no torque - they are just rolling along. Would indeed slippage occur at the front wheels, the VC (Haldex) will create a power flow to the rear axle.

But if only the front is powered in no slip situations (which is almost always) and the rear does not get any torque - how can Volvo claim it to be an AWD system?

Surprisingly, if only one axle is powered, front and rear axles do not rotate at the same speed. The powered axle always spins a little faster (about 5%) than the axle with the wheels just rolling along. It slips a little on the ground. So, the VC (now Haldex) reacts to the speed difference and compensates with a proportional allocation of torque for the rear. This way the rear axle will get 5% of the torque and thus each rear wheel receives 2.5%.

Voila! All 4 wheels get power all the time. Volvo PR did not lie - it is full time AWD.

However, a power distribution of 95/5 makes for very insufficient traction use. The front axle is very likely to start spinning with the slightest change of traction. A power split of about 50/50 guarantees the safest use of available traction. After all that's the way 4WD was intended to be. Volvo does not offer that.

A serious drawback of the older Volvo system (Viscous Coupling) is, that you will probably have to buy four new tires if only one is bad.

Please note, that newer Volvos with Haldex couplings do not suffer damage when the tire sizes are slightly unequal.



所有跟帖: 

awd除了subaru和audi(a3除外)都是騙人的。 -殺雨- 給 殺雨 發送悄悄話 殺雨 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 02/26/2009 postreply 22:15:16

a3的難道不是quttro? -booloolood- 給 booloolood 發送悄悄話 (12 bytes) () 02/26/2009 postreply 22:24:56

ok, A3 doesnt use torsen -booloolood- 給 booloolood 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/26/2009 postreply 22:41:46

TT也是騙人的。 -UberAlles- 給 UberAlles 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 03:42:01

what's ur point?AWD<>4WD,supposed to be like this -yyang3- 給 yyang3 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 07:46:31

There are AWDs and then there are AWDs. -UberAlles- 給 UberAlles 發送悄悄話 (1717 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 08:23:16

Ding! Does 95/5 AWD help much or just little on snow/icy road? -booloolood- 給 booloolood 發送悄悄話 (562 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 08:45:59

Further info on Subaru AWD systems -UberAlles- 給 UberAlles 發送悄悄話 (829 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 11:55:59

They both very good at handling snow. Volvo is more comfy. -shgl999- 給 shgl999 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 02/27/2009 postreply 12:33:22

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”