正文
牛津大學教授Richard Brent長期以來受聘於《亞洲數學月刊》（Asian Journal of Mathematics, 簡稱AJM）任編委。日前，他因不滿雜誌主編丘成桐先生誘逼編委會在三日內同意丘的學生的文章在三日內發表而憤然辭去AJM編委的職務。下麵是他證實曹朱文章審稿程序違規的信件。
( )
[譯文]：
我認為那段陳述（指《紐約客》關於曹朱文章審稿程序違規的報道）是正確的，盡管我不能確認準確的數字和日期了。
2006年4月23日我收到了下述郵件（指丘成桐要編委三天之內發表曹朱文章的郵件）。因為郵件沒有附上論文摘要，所以編委根本無法作出評估。因為這篇論文不屬於我的研究領域，所以我沒有回複。後來別的一些編輯抄送了我一些郵件，但到那時候已經太遲了，因為論文已經發表了。
順便說一下，作為我本人對此的一種反應，我最近辭去了《亞洲數學雜誌》編委的職務。
您的,
Richard Brent
[英文原文]
I think the statement is essentially correct although I can't confirmthe precise numbers or dates.
On 23 April 2006 I received the following email. There was no paper or even abstract attached, so it's not clear on what basis the editors were meant to comment. Since the paper was clearly not in my area I did not reply. Later I was cc-ed in some emails by other editors, but by then it was too late as it seems that the paper had already been published.
By the way, partly in reaction to this controversy, I have recently resigned
from the editorial board of the AJM.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Brent
___________________________________________
Yau's letter to the Edotorial Board of AJM:
Dear Editors,
The paper The Hamilton-Perelman Theory of Ricci Flow --- the Poincare and geometrization conjectures by Huai-Dong Cao and Xi-Ping Zhu has been read by Prof. S.T. Yau and he has recommended the paper be published in the Asian Journal of Mathematics.
I would be most grateful if you could send me your comments within the next three days. If no comments are received by then, the paper is considered accepted for publication.
Thank you very much for your help.
Very best regards,
S.T. Yau [注：S.T. Yau即丘成桐]
Raymond Chan
（供稿：義大於利） [首發,歡迎轉載，請注明出處]- 支持此文作者/記者( )
( )
[譯文]：
我認為那段陳述（指《紐約客》關於曹朱文章審稿程序違規的報道）是正確的，盡管我不能確認準確的數字和日期了。
2006年4月23日我收到了下述郵件（指丘成桐要編委三天之內發表曹朱文章的郵件）。因為郵件沒有附上論文摘要，所以編委根本無法作出評估。因為這篇論文不屬於我的研究領域，所以我沒有回複。後來別的一些編輯抄送了我一些郵件，但到那時候已經太遲了，因為論文已經發表了。
順便說一下，作為我本人對此的一種反應，我最近辭去了《亞洲數學雜誌》編委的職務。
您的,
Richard Brent
[英文原文]
I think the statement is essentially correct although I can't confirmthe precise numbers or dates.
On 23 April 2006 I received the following email. There was no paper or even abstract attached, so it's not clear on what basis the editors were meant to comment. Since the paper was clearly not in my area I did not reply. Later I was cc-ed in some emails by other editors, but by then it was too late as it seems that the paper had already been published.
By the way, partly in reaction to this controversy, I have recently resigned
from the editorial board of the AJM.
Yours sincerely,
Richard Brent
___________________________________________
Yau's letter to the Edotorial Board of AJM:
Dear Editors,
The paper The Hamilton-Perelman Theory of Ricci Flow --- the Poincare and geometrization conjectures by Huai-Dong Cao and Xi-Ping Zhu has been read by Prof. S.T. Yau and he has recommended the paper be published in the Asian Journal of Mathematics.
I would be most grateful if you could send me your comments within the next three days. If no comments are received by then, the paper is considered accepted for publication.
Thank you very much for your help.
Very best regards,
S.T. Yau [注：S.T. Yau即丘成桐]
Raymond Chan
（供稿：義大於利） [首發,歡迎轉載，請注明出處]- 支持此文作者/記者( )
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.
