This is why you need professional help

來源: 檸檬椰子汁 2022-01-27 18:03:00 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2115 bytes)
回答: 你確定嗎?我有同樣的問題Redrockmm2022-01-27 17:51:26

https://www.accruit.com/blog/same-taxpayer-requirement-1031-tax-deferred-exchange

 

The Same Taxpayer Rule and Spouses

There are times when only one spouse is on title to the relinquished property and the taxpayer would like to add the spouse to the title to the replacement property.  This is not encouraged since the other spouse was not the same taxpayer who sold the relinquished property.  When a taxpayer does want to bring the spouse on title, advisors usually suggest waiting until the “exchange is old and cold.” Waiting several years should be sufficient. 

Other times, only one spouse will be on title to property but the lender in connection with the replacement property financing will require the additional spouse to go on title as a condition of the loan.  If this is a written request from the lender, rather than the taxpayer’s election, it is unlikely that the IRS would find it objectionable.  Should someone wish to use an abundance of caution, a document could be drawn up confirming that the additional spouse is holding the interest “in trust” on behalf of the original spouse.

 

所有跟帖: 

先謝再讀。頭大了 -Redrockmm- 給 Redrockmm 發送悄悄話 (44 bytes) () 01/27/2022 postreply 18:09:20

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!