裏爾克《杜伊諾哀歌》第一首第一節的18種英文翻譯

裏爾克，奧地利著名詩人，被譽為20世紀偉大的德語詩人之一。《杜伊諾哀歌》為裏爾克晚期代表作，也是20世紀德語詩歌的精品。該作為裏爾克一生的經驗和思辨的結晶，代表了裏爾克詩歌創作的至高成就，同時也是成熟期的裏爾克藝術風格的集大成者。

裏爾克《杜伊諾哀歌》第一首第一節的18種英文翻譯      DIE ERSTE ELEGIE WER, wenn ich schriee, hörte mich denn aus der Engel Ordnungen? und gesetzt selbst, es nähme einer mich plötzlich ans Herz: ich verginge von seinem stärkeren Dasein. Denn das Schöne ist nichts als des Schrecklichen Anfang, den wir noch grade ertragen, und wir bewundern es so, weil es gelassen verschmäht, uns zu zerstören. Ein jeder Engel ist schrecklich. 如果我哭喊，各級天使中間有誰 聽得見我？即使其中一位突然把我 擁向心頭；我也會由於他的 更強健的存在而喪忘。因為美無非是 我們恰巧能夠忍受的恐怖之開端， 我們之所以驚羨它，則因為它寧靜得不屑於 摧毀我們。每一個天使都是可怕的。（綠原  譯） Leishman/Spenser (1939):          Who, if I cried, would hear me among the angelic orders?          And even if one of them suddenly pressed me against his heart, I should fade in the strength of stronger existence.          For Beauty’s nothing but beginning of Terror we’re still just able to bear, and why we adore it so is because it serenely distains to destroy us.          Each single angel is terrible. Behn (1957):          Who, if I cried out, would heed me amid the host of the Angels?          Still, should an Angel exalt and fold me into his heart I should vanish, lost in his greater being.           For beauty is only a seed of dread to be endured yet adored since it distains to destroy us.           An Angel alone, is misted in dread… MacIntyre (1961):          Who, if I shouted, among the hierarchy of angles would hear me?          And supposing one of them took me suddenly to his heart, I would perish before his stronger existence.                   For beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror we can just barely endure, and we admire it so because it calmly distains to destroy us.          Every angle is terrible. Garmey/Wilson (1972):          Who, if I cried, would hear me from the order of Angels?          And even if one suddenly held me to his heart: I would dissolve there from his stronger presence.          For Beauty is only the beginning of a terror we can just barely endure, and what we so admire is its calm distaining to destroy us.          Every Angel brings terror. Boney (1975):          Who of the angelic hosts would hear me, even if I cried out?          Yet granted, one of them suddenly embraced me, I would only perish from his stronger being.          For Beauty is nothing but the beginning of awesomeness which we can barely endure and we marvel at it so because it calmly distains to destroy us.          Each and every angel is awesome. Paulin (1977):          And if I cried, who’d listen to me in those angelic orders?           Even if one of them suddenly held me to his heart, I’d vanish in his overwhelming presence.           Because beauty’s nothing but the start of terror we can hardly bear, and we adore it because of the serene scorn it could kill us with.           Every angel’s terrifying. Young (1978):           If I cried out                    who would hear me up there                               among the angelic orders?           And suppose one suddenly                    took me to his heart                               I would shrivel           I couldn’t survive                    next to his                              greater existence.           Beauty is only the first touch of terror we can still bear and it awes us so much because it so coolly distains to destroy us.           Every single angle is terrible! Miranda (1981):           What angel, if I cried out, would hear me?           And even if one of them impulsively embraced me, I’d be crushed by its strength.           For Beauty is just the beginning of a terror we can barely stand: we admire it because it calmly refuses to crush us.           Every angel terrifies. Mitchell (1982):           Who, if I cried out, would hear me among the angels’ hierarchies?           And even if one of them pressed me suddenly against his heart: I would be consumed in that overwhelming existence.           For beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror, which we still are just able to endure, and we are so awed because it serenely distains to annihilate us.           Every angel is terrifying. Flemming (1985):           Who, if I cried out, would hear me among the angels’ hierarchies?           And even if one of them suddenly pressed me against his heart, I would perish in the embrace of his stronger existence.           For beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror which we are barely able to endure and are awed because it serenely distains to annihilate us.           Each single angle is terrifying. Hunter (1987):           Who, though I cry aloud, would hear me in the angel order?           And should my plea ascend, were I gathered to the glory of some incandescent heart, my own faint flame of being would fail for the glare.           For beauty is only the infant of scarcely endurable Terror, and we are amazed when it casually spares us.           Every Angel is terrible. Cohn (1989):           Who, if I cried out, might hear me ---- among the ranked Angels?           Even if One suddenly clasped me to his heart           I would die of the force of his being.           Beauty is as close to terror as we can well endure. Angles would not condescend to damn our meager souls. That is why they awe and why they terrify us so.          Every angle is terrible! Hammer/Jaeger (1991):          If I did cry out, who would hear me through the Angel Orders?          And suppose one of them suddenly pulled me to his heart: I’d dissolve beside his stronger existence.          But beauty’s nothing but the start of that terror we can just manage to bear, and we’re fascinated by it because it serenely scorns to destroy us.          Every angel is terrifying. Oswald (1992):         Who. If I cried out, would hear me then, out of the orders of angles?         And even supposing one suddenly took me close to the heart, I would perish from that stronger existence.         For what strikes us as beauty is nothing but all we can bear of terror’s beginning, and we admire it so, because it calmly disdains to destroy us.         Every angle strikes terror. Gass (1998):         Who, if I cried, would hear me among the Dominions of Angels?         And even if one of them suddenly held me against his heart, I would fade in the grip of that completer existence.         For Beauty is nothing but the approach of a Terror we’re only just able to bear, and we worship it so because it serenely distains to destroy us.        Every Angel is awesome. Harris:        Who, if I cried, heard me from the angels Orders?        and set, it would take one me suddenly to the heart: I would pass from its stronger existence.       Because the beautiful is not anything as terrible start, which we still degrees bear, and we admire it in such a way, because it defames calmly, to destroy us.       Each angel is terrible. Paulin/Hutchinson (1996):       Who, if I cried out, would hear me among the ranks of the angels?       And even if one of them suddenly clasped me to his heart, I should die of his stronger being.       Fro beauty is nothing but the very beginning of terror we’re only just able to bear, and its wonder for us is that it casually spares us instead of destroying us.       Each one of the angels is terrible. Kline (2001):       Who, if I cried out, would hear me among the Angelic Orders?       And even if one were to suddenly take me to its heart, I would vanish into its stronger existence.       For beauty is nothing but the beginning of terror, that we are still able to bear, and we revere it so, because it calmly disdains to destroy us.       Every Angel is terror.

所有跟帖： 

• 沙發！ -beautifulwind- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 09:01:18

• 讀得懂就喜歡：）恐怖的美麗，天使是魔鬼嗎？：） -beautifulwind- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 09:10:09

• 謝謝喜歡 ：）據說死亡，情人和天使 是裏爾克詩中最重要的主題。天使不是一般意義上的天使，主要承擔把有形事物轉向無形事物的功能， -盈盈一笑間- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 09:55:04

• If I scream who among the heavenly hierarchy could hear me -移花接木- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 09:14:55

• 第19種翻譯隆重登場。。LOL -盈盈一笑間- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 10:00:28

• 我第一眼看成了18國英文翻譯 -移花接木- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 09:16:05

• 英國英語，美國英語，印度英語，中式英語，澳洲英語。。來上18套 LOL -盈盈一笑間- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 09:58:24

• 裏爾克的巔峰之作。盈盈應該評論一下各個譯本的優劣 -LinMu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 19:03:39

• 的確，因為經典名作，才有這麽多不同譯本。林兄言重，我不敢評論這些名家翻譯，但是會當作晨讀材料體會一下各版本的不同妙處。：） -盈盈一笑間- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/27/2021 postreply 20:14:10

• 恭喜盈盈。首頁進來，謝謝網管，裏爾克《杜伊諾哀歌》第一首第一節的18種英文翻譯 推薦成功 -beautifulwind- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/28/2021 postreply 19:00:20

• 謝謝風兒，謝謝網管。：） -盈盈一笑間- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/29/2021 postreply 06:08:56

• Wow! That’s a pretty good idea of yours. I learned a lot. Thanks -LYJiang- ♂ (0 bytes) () 10/19/2021 postreply 21:32:03