For this kind of litigation, hearing must be required, and it is

沒有oral argument. 這類案子的出庭聽案得由我提出，法庭批準，我沒有提出。因為法庭很少批準hearing這類案子。都是文本陳述即可，不需要oral argument 。不知他們是否會提出聽案要求。現在他們沒有。

所有跟帖： 

• The rule is clear. -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (1172 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:27:12

• 這個案子隻有federal circuit Court rule 適用 -caizane- ♂ (400 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:41:39

• reply to your informal brief is optional, they choose not to rep -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (259 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 06:55:50

• 可能是這樣 -caizane- ♂ (449 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 07:12:44

• reply is optional, no reply is not default to lose -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (106 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 08:06:42

• 看吧 -caizane- ♂ (401 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 08:19:47

• 還有可能是 -caizane- ♂ (265 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 08:42:46

• 也可能是你申訴的對象錯了。 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (633 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 09:08:00

• 這都不是問題 -caizane- ♂ (220 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 09:17:28

• 既然你這麽有信心，那麽就坐著等贏吧。 -檸檬椰子汁- ♂ (57 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 09:23:05

• 看吧 -caizane- ♂ (98 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 09:59:22

• 如是這樣就好 -caizane- ♂ (310 bytes) () 05/31/2018 postreply 07:18:06