LZ can win on "reasonable accommodation under American Disabilit

I am aggressive because the company is violating the ADA. If LZ has adequate medical evidence, she qualifies as disabled (for certain length of time). Her company should provide reasonable accommodation.

Whether working from home is "reasonable" accommodation or not, depends on the facts. I assume her lawyer determined that it is reasonable. You don't get stuff in life without asking for it.

所有跟帖： 

• 據俺的理解，the comapny is not violating ADA, -水中撈月- ♂ (651 bytes) () 10/24/2014 postreply 21:47:40

• 你的理解不錯，但是請看這個和ＬＺ類似的２０１４的新案件 -lexm5- ♂ (352 bytes) () 10/25/2014 postreply 05:39:39

• 那這真要看樓主對‘權’‘益’的想法了 -慧惠- ♀ (324 bytes) () 10/25/2014 postreply 06:08:49

• 也是， 是權利應該爭取。 -禾葉- ♀ (0 bytes) () 10/24/2014 postreply 21:48:24