1.insurance 2.why? 3. no.

來源: jy101 於 2012-11-09 14:52:36 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (0 bytes)
回答: 再問LLC問題 由 lakeviewredhouse 於 2012-11-09 14:48:04

所有跟帖： 

• thank you! -lakeviewredhouse- ♀ 給 lakeviewredhouse 發送悄悄話 (89 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 14:55:38

• isn't that defeats the purpose? -jy101- ♂ 給 jy101 發送悄悄話 jy101 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 14:56:56

• 回複：isn't that defeats the purpose? -lakeviewredhouse- ♀ 給 lakeviewredhouse 發送悄悄話 (103 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 15:10:30

• if you want limited liability.. -jy101- ♂ 給 jy101 發送悄悄話 jy101 的博客首頁 (165 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 15:35:04

• appreciaste your advice. -lakeviewredhouse- ♀ 給 lakeviewredhouse 發送悄悄話 (128 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 17:24:03

• You mean no need to have LLC and insurance is enough? -nova01- ♀ 給 nova01 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 11/09/2012 postreply 17:32:33

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！