Not really?

來源: wooddiy 於 2012-07-23 14:05:05 [檔案] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (1803 bytes)

回答: 美國有些法律對於房東來說是BS 由 backchina888 於 2012-07-23 13:50:44

1、下雪天，房客不小心在出租房處摔倒，房東甚至要負責任: umbrella? Not really either.

2、房客不交房租，房東自己無權直接趕人: of course not. Landlord is not authorized to live during lease.

3、走法律程序，費時1~5個月(視不同州而異)而不顧房東的得失: ask TT, especially JY101's "bible".

4、Eviction後期房客自己搬走，順手牽羊把房東的財物搬走或蓄意毀壞財物，房東財產難以得到有效保護 Read JY101's Bible!

5、 Eviction等到set out那一天，要自己請人把房客的東西搬出去，且要小心看管好並避免雨淋 Really? Read JY101's Bible!!

6、水費（前owener的或租客的）永遠與當前房東有關（也許不同州有異）: probably not. Why the previous owner's?

7、房產稅往往高與房子價值計算、每年上漲、不管是否有人住: Of course this is the correct way.

Your examples are not enough to show SB or BS.

您的位置：文學城 » 論壇 » 投資理財 » 地產法律 » Not really?

• But those examples are common sense, -backchina888- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/23/2012 postreply 14:08:53

• where is JY101's Bible?? thanks -HappyWed- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/23/2012 postreply 14:21:16