世紀之戰49

世紀之戰49

 

弧度度

 

習近平是複辟者而非顛覆者

 

一直以來，總有人把“終結中共”的希望寄托在習偉人身上，這其實是個誤區。

 

斯大林搞“大清洗”，整死兩千萬人，蘇共垮台沒有？毛澤東搞三反五反、大躍進、十年文革，鬥死餓死上億人，中共垮台沒有？金正恩狠起來連他的親姑父、前朝重臣都能進行炮轟、犬決，朝鮮人民是否因此擺脫了金家的掌控——被極限奴役壓榨的處境是否有絲毫改善？

 

身為“覺醒者”，我們不能人雲亦雲，而要保持獨立思考。中共國病入膏肓，腐敗隻是表象，真正的病根卻是“上梁不正下梁歪”。正是因為當今聖上諱疾棄醫，這才導致上行下效、無官不貪，進而形成一個斬不斷、理還亂的“貪腐利益鏈”。高舉反腐大旗者海外存款超萬億美元，而且每年都在成幾何倍數遞增，又該如何說服黨奴們“毫不利己專門利人”地為人民服務呢？

 

我們不妨設身處地想一想，倘若你是一名趙家官員，你會怎麽做？大家都貪就你不貪，必然被排擠出局；大家都腐就你不腐，請問你又該如何“提錢進步”？在這個連鬼都會貪腐的體製下，你這邊剛貪撈成百上千萬就被抓了，那邊下令抓你的人卻把成千上萬億資產轉移至海外，請問你會不會心悅誠服？

 

“選擇性反腐”的本質就是新貪抓舊貪，大貪吃小貪，用犧牲數百萬貪官作為代價（躺平的韭菜拒絕生長，唯有痛宰小肥羊）去填補“東升西降”——突擊消費、任性撒幣、挑釁列強的黑窟窿，而那些新提拔上位的親信、舊屬，竟然比原來的技術官僚更貪更腐，其結果隻能是越反越腐。

 

最後，我們還應搞清楚，“選擇性反腐”的目的是什麽？

 

真正的反腐應該是建立起一整套防微杜漸的製度——允許言論自由發動群眾揭黑，允許民間辦報進行輿論監督，允許司法獨立實現依法治貪……然而，習式反腐卻恰恰相反，非但不願把權力關比籠子——建立三權分立的製度從源頭上杜絕腐敗，反而堅決拒絕西方那一套，大搞唯我獨尊的“選擇性反腐”。你之所以被抓，不是因為你貪汙了多少國有資金，而是因為你講了幾句習皇不愛聽的真話（譬如李克強）、私底下表達了不同意見或酒醉後講了幾句不利於習皇的言論（絕大多數黨政軍幹部都是因此而觸犯了真龍天子的逆鱗，惹得龍顏震怒後而遭到逮捕審查）。

 

也就是說，“選擇性反腐”的目的是為了消除異己，把紅色江山變成習家江山，把一黨專政變成個人獨裁，開曆史倒車再來一次殺無赦的文革2.0，直至把中共國變成大號朝鮮……請問：在朝鮮模式的統治下，中共會因此而垮台嗎？中共國會因此而實現民主嗎？中國人民會因此而過上好日子嗎？習上台後，在全國成立上千所馬克思學院，每年都要浪費天量的民脂民膏召開世界共產主義大會，你覺得他會如你所願地甘作戈爾巴喬夫或蔣經國——終結中共嗎？答案是絕對不會，他的雄心壯誌是超越毛澤東、斯大林，不但要做千古一帝，還要做世界領袖。

 

正是在習皇一意孤行——發誓不聽勸地一條道走到黑，年複一年地窮折騰，撞了南牆也絕不回頭的大背景下，中共國經濟再次迎來塌方式崩潰的高光時刻——共同富裕遙遙無期，集體返貧指日可待，中國人民的苦日子才剛剛開始。

 

習皇上台後，大搞“選擇性反腐”的目的絕對不是為了消滅中共，而是為了維護中共，將個人的淫威淩駕於黨之上，再以黨之名（或以人民的名義）複辟帝製、搶劫民財——把權力、財力全部集中到個人之手，確保習家江山延續千秋萬代。

 

有智慧網友歎息袁世凱：“老袁啊，你真是個傻子，想當皇帝還不容易？把龍袍改成打補丁的睡衣，登基大典改成開國大典，後宮嬪妃改成文藝女兵，親王大臣改成革命戰友，聖旨改成最高指示……不就成功了？隻可惜你還是不知變通，結果換來身死國滅。太不值了，誠實害死人呀！”

 

習皇繼承了毛太祖的五大遺誌：一、隻做減法不做加法。鄧、江、胡主張把蛋糕做大做強，唯毛與習砸爛一切卻又無法重建。二、與天鬥與地鬥與人鬥。鄧、江、胡強調以經濟建設為中心，毛、習強調以階級鬥爭為中心。三、開曆史倒車複辟帝製。鄧、江、胡留下十年換屆的傳承，毛、習把中共國變成一人獨裁的家天下。四、有權任性胡折騰。鄧、江、胡搞集體協商決策的有限糾錯機製，毛、習搞絕不容忍任何反對意見的唯我獨尊。五、爭做世界領袖，鄧、江、胡搞韜光養晦的悶聲發大財，毛、習搞殺敵為零、自損三千的嘴炮外交、撒幣外交、戰狼外交……

 

綜觀習皇的執政過程，無非就是把毛太祖犯過的錯誤——新瓶裝舊酒地拿出來再重犯一遍罷了。那些期盼習皇會終結中共的人，何如期盼毛太祖從玻璃棺材裏爬出來再度奪權執政？

 

（未完待續）

 

The Battle of the Century 49

 

Hu Dudu

 

Xi Jinping is a Restorer, Not a Subverter

 

For a long time, some people have pinned their hopes for "ending the CCP" on Xi Jinping, but this is a misconception.

 

Stalin's Great Purge killed 20 million people, yet the Soviet Union collapsed. Mao Zedong's Three-Anti and Five-Anti Campaigns, the Great Leap Forward, and the ten-year Cultural Revolution killed hundreds of millions, yet the CCP collapsed. Kim Jong-un, when ruthless, even bombarded and executed his own uncle and former high-ranking officials, but did this free the North Korean people from the Kim family's control—did their plight of extreme enslavement and exploitation improve in the slightest?

 

As "awakened ones," we cannot simply follow the crowd; we must maintain independent thinking. The CCP regime is terminally ill; corruption is merely a symptom. The real root cause is "a corrupt leader leads to a corrupt lower class." It is precisely because the current leader ignores the problem that this has led to a top-down effect, with every official becoming corrupt, forming an inextricable and tangled chain of corruption. Those who champion the fight against corruption have overseas bank accounts exceeding one trillion US dollars, and these accounts are increasing exponentially every year. How can they possibly convince their party followers to serve the people "selflessly and exclusively"?

 

Let's put ourselves in their shoes. If you were an official from the Zhao family, what would you do? If everyone is corrupt and you're not, you'll inevitably be ostracized; if everyone is corrupt and you're not, how can you "advance by offering money"? In a system where even ghosts are corrupt, if you're arrested for embezzling tens of millions, but the very person who ordered your arrest transfers trillions of dollars overseas, wouldn't you be convinced?

 

The essence of "selective anti-corruption" is to have new corrupt officials target old ones, and big corrupt officials prey on smaller ones, sacrificing millions of corrupt officials as a price (the "lying leeks" refuse to grow, only the fat sheep are slaughtered) to fill the black hole of "Eastern rise and Western fall"—rushed spending, reckless spending, and provocations against foreign powers. Meanwhile, those newly promoted cronies and former subordinates are even more corrupt than the original technocrats, resulting in a vicious cycle of increasing corruption despite anti-corruption efforts.

 

Finally, we must clarify the purpose of "selective anti-corruption."

 

True anti-corruption should establish a comprehensive system to nip corruption in the bud—allowing freedom of speech to mobilize the masses to expose wrongdoing, allowing privately run newspapers for public opinion supervision, and allowing judicial independence to achieve the rule of law in combating corruption… However, Xi Jinping's anti-corruption campaign is exactly the opposite. Instead of putting power in a cage—establishing a system of separation of powers to eliminate corruption at its source—he resolutely rejects the Western model, engaging in a self-serving "selective anti-corruption." The reason you were arrested wasn't because you embezzled a lot of state funds, but because you spoke a few truths that Xi Jinping didn't want to hear (like Li Keqiang), expressed differing opinions privately, or made some remarks unfavorable to Xi Jinping while drunk (the vast majority of party, government, and military cadres have offended the emperor for this reason, incurring his wrath and being arrested and investigated).

 

In other words, the purpose of "selective anti-corruption" is to eliminate dissidents, turn the red regime into Xi's regime, transform one-party rule into personal dictatorship, reverse history and have another Cultural Revolution 2.0 with no mercy, until the CCP-controlled China becomes a larger version of North Korea… I ask you: Under a North Korean-style rule, will the CCP collapse? Will the CCP achieve democracy? Will the Chinese people live a better life? After Xi came to power, he established thousands of Marxist colleges across the country and wastes enormous amounts of public funds every year to hold the World Communism Congress. Do you think he will willingly become a Gorbachev or Chiang Ching-kuo—to end the CCP—as you wish? The answer is absolutely not. His ambition is to surpass Mao Zedong and Stalin, not only to become an emperor for all time but also a world leader.

 

It is precisely against this backdrop of Xi Jinping's obstinate pursuit of his own path—a relentless, uncompromising course, year after year of reckless actions, a refusal to turn back even after hitting a wall—that the Chinese economy has once again reached a point of collapse. Common prosperity remains a distant dream, collective poverty is imminent, and the Chinese people's suffering has only just begun.

 

Since coming to power, Xi Jinping's "selective anti-corruption" campaign has not aimed to eliminate the CCP, but rather to maintain it, to place his personal power above the Party, and to restore imperial rule and plunder the people's wealth in the name of the Party (or the people)—concentrating all power and resources in his own hands to ensure the Xi family's rule continues for millennia.

 

One insightful netizen lamented Yuan Shikai: "Old Yuan, you were truly a fool. Wanting to be emperor was easy enough! Just change the dragon robe to patched pajamas, the coronation ceremony to a founding ceremony, the concubines to female soldiers in the arts, the princes and ministers to revolutionary comrades, the imperial edicts to supreme directives… and you'd succeed! It's just a pity you couldn't adapt, resulting in your death and the destruction of your country. It was such a waste; honesty kills!"

 

 

Xi Jinping inherited five major legacyes of Mao Zedong: 1. Only subtraction, no addition. Deng, Jiang, and Hu advocated making the pie bigger and stronger, but Mao and Xi destroyed everything and couldn't rebuild. 2. Struggle against heaven, earth, and man. Deng, Jiang, and Hu emphasized economic construction as the center, while Mao and Xi emphasized class struggle. 3. Turning back the clock and restoring the imperial system. Deng, Jiang, and Hu left a legacy of ten-year leadership transitions, while Mao and Xi turned the CCP regime into a one-man dictatorship. 4. Recklessly exercising power and engaging in arbitrary actions. Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, and Hu Jintao employed a limited corrective mechanism based on collective consultation in decision-making, while Mao Zedong and Xi Jinping adopted a policy of absolute autocracy, tolerating no dissent. Fifth, in their pursuit of world leadership, Deng, Jiang, and Hu pursued a policy of "keeping a low profile and quietly accumulating wealth," while Mao and Xi engaged in "empty talk diplomacy, money-spraying diplomacy, and wolf warrior diplomacy"—a policy that resulted in zero casualties and significant self-inflicted damage.

 

Looking at Xi Jinping's rule, it's nothing more than repeating the mistakes Mao Zedong made—old wine in new bottles. Those who hope Xi Jinping will end the CCP are no better off than those who hope Mao Zedong will rise from his coffin and seize power again.

 

(To be continued)