Intel 8086 (1978) – The beginning of the x86 instruction set architecture (ISA).
The name "x86" comes from the last digits of its successors (8086, 80186, 80286, etc.).
Intel owned the ISA design as intellectual property, but the CPU market soon became more complex due to licensing.
Early Licensing
In the late 1970s and 1980s, Intel licensed x86 designs to other companies to ensure supply for IBM PCs.
IBM insisted on multiple suppliers for CPUs, which forced Intel to share rights.
AMD, NEC, Siemens, Fujitsu, Harris, IBM – became “second-source” manufacturers of Intel x86 processors.
AMD was the most significant: it gained rights to manufacture Intel’s 8086, 80186, and 80286 under cross-license deals.
These licenses gave AMD deep knowledge of x86 internals and set the stage for future competition.
80386 Era (1985) – Intel refused to share 386 designs with AMD, claiming the license didn’t extend that far.
AMD sued, leading to a decade-long legal battle over x86 IP.
Result:
AMD won rights to design x86-compatible chips (Am386, Am486, K5, K6).
Intel maintained ownership of the x86 ISA definition, but courts ruled that AMD could implement compatible CPUs.
Intel vs. AMD cross-license agreements (renewed periodically):
AMD had rights to use x86 ISA, but only to make its own designs.
Intel kept the right to manufacture but agreed not to block AMD from ISA compatibility.
These agreements typically renewed every 10 years.
Cyrix, VIA, Transmeta – also built x86-compatible CPUs via clean-room reverse engineering.
They did not have the same legal depth as AMD, which limited their market longevity.
VIA eventually acquired Cyrix and Centaur, securing its own limited x86 IP rights.
AMD64 (2003) – AMD introduced 64-bit extensions to x86 (later called x86-64).
Intel initially resisted, pushing IA-64 (Itanium), but it failed commercially.
Intel eventually adopted AMD’s extensions (calling it Intel 64).
IP note: AMD originated x86-64, but Intel licensed and implemented it, creating shared control.
Intel–AMD Cross-License Renewal – still active, covering use of x86 ISA.
AMD cannot sublicense x86 to others.
VIA remains the only other company with legitimate x86 rights.
Chinese x86 Projects:
Zhaoxin (joint venture between VIA and Shanghai city government) has legal x86 rights via VIA’s IP.
Hygon (AMD + Chinese partnership) briefly licensed Zen cores for China, but restrictions tightened under U.S. trade controls.
IP Restrictions:
Today, only Intel, AMD, and VIA (Zhaoxin) have full legal rights to design and sell x86 CPUs.
No new entrants can gain access because Intel no longer grants new ISA licenses.
Intel: Original creator, still primary owner of the ISA.
AMD: Gained x86 IP rights through lawsuits and cross-licensing; created x86-64.
VIA/Zhaoxin: Survived via acquisitions and licenses, primarily in niche and Chinese markets.
Others (Cyrix, Transmeta, NEC, etc.): Defunct or absorbed.