The theme of jurors as essential for democracy can be extrapolated from the given text by examining the importance of the jury system in safeguarding justice and preventing abuses of power. Here are key points that can be drawn to develop this theme:
Historical Context and Importance of Rule of Law: The text contrasts the Western jury system with historical practices where the elite were often above the law ("刑不上大夫") and arbitrary abuses were rampant. The jury system, with its deep historical roots in Western legal tradition, represents a crucial mechanism for ensuring that justice is applied equally and fairly, not influenced by the status or power of the individuals involved.
Checks and Balances: One of the central tenets of democracy is the system of checks and balances. The jury system acts as a critical check on judicial power. If trials were conducted solely by professional judges, there would be a risk of bias, corruption, or undue influence from powerful entities. Jurors, as representatives of the community, add an essential layer of scrutiny and democratic legitimacy to the judicial process.
Citizen Participation and Responsibility: Serving as a juror is a civic duty and an exercise in democratic participation. Jurors bring diverse perspectives and experiences, which help to ground legal proceedings in the realities of everyday life. The process requires jurors to engage deeply with the evidence and the law, fostering a sense of responsibility and engagement with the principles of justice.
Collective Decision-Making: The requirement for a jury to reach a consensus encourages thorough deliberation and mitigates individual biases. The text suggests that although it might be challenging to reach unanimous decisions, this collective process is vital for achieving balanced and fair outcomes. The need for consensus among jurors helps prevent rash or unjust decisions, ensuring that the burden of proof is adequately met before a verdict is rendered.
Protection Against State Power: A key democratic principle is the protection of individuals against potential abuses by the state. The jury system serves as a bulwark against the concentration of judicial power, ensuring that the community has a say in the administration of justice. This protection is particularly crucial in societies where the state or powerful interests might otherwise exert undue influence over legal proceedings.
Safeguarding Against Miscarriages of Justice: The text highlights the dual nature of the jury system's gatekeeping role—it can both protect the innocent and occasionally allow the guilty to escape. This gatekeeping function is essential for preventing miscarriages of justice, as it ensures that convictions are only secured when there is a clear and convincing case against the accused.
In summary, the jury system is portrayed as indispensable to democracy because it ensures that the administration of justice remains transparent, participatory, and resistant to corruption or undue influence
說實話，男女共審強奸案，是一件非常頭疼的事情。因男女對那玩意兒在各自的大腦裏有著天然和後天早就形成了的固有看法和情感。如今不僅要對自己大腦裏的固定觀念開展批鬥會。還要與女人們一起公開討論具體細節部分。本著對被告和原告的公正。在這塊道德和法律重疊區域，弄清楚哪個是道德層麵問題哪個是法律層麵問題。在過去幾天的庭審討論中，六個女陪審員，年齡從30左右到60多歲，幾乎一致認定是強奸。我們6個男的，2個上點年紀的略表同意，但不肯定。另2個中年人。謹慎的同意但要再看看。我身旁坐著的另一個胖老弟，是個50歲的油漆匠。他自始至終都沒表示過自己的看法，都是跟著眾人的反應。他不內向，閑聊時他的話也蠻多的。陪審員在法庭從事期間，除了打架不行。對案子享有特殊言論豁免權。我基本上隻是觀察和旁聽，在最後一天投票時發表了我的看法。
|
男
