2011 (1)
2016 (1035)
2017 (752)
2018 (978)
2019 (385)
2020 (175)
2021 (235)
2022 (101)
2023 (983)
PS: Postscript*** Add-on note for my posts: 各位有緣人【總之就是正在看著屏幕的您!】,[em:3:] blessings! “己所不欲,勿施於人”,實質就是換位思考、尊重別人的利益 = decency。I wrote all my posts based on what I read online, a way of taking break, a routine of daily activity. I can't write anything without this fabric of other's writing, an inspiration that triggers my own motivation to write. Copy/paste the original article provides me with a context to track down where I got the idea, a way to credit back to those writers.“己所不欲,勿施於人”,實質就是換位思考、尊重別人的利益 - You're free to quote my writing. If you're objected to my quotation, can you let me know so I can correct it? Thanks.
Reference: I'd credit the original source of my inspiration to write this post by citing the entire article above, only for academic/teaching purpose, but not for commercial purpose - making and promoting any products. I use both URL (URL is an acronym for Uniform Resource Locator and is a reference (an address) to a resource on the Internet. A URL has two main components: Protocol identifier: For the URL http://example.com , the protocol identifier is http . Resource name: For the URL http://example.com , the resource name is example.com .) and the entire article for my electronic library as URL is drifted with time, so it's hard to find the original citation. Let me know if you're objected to my citation of your article - I'd act accordingly. Thanks so much for your attention.
~~~~~~~~~
add-on note: I've practiced to copy/paste the entire document of my reference to the post I referred to as above to avoid the below problem. It's hectic to do, but it's good for readers. You can see why below.
A common problem with many Chinese Language websites
In re-reading some of my older blog articles, I have found the following problem with many Chinese language websites. When my article gave reference to material associated with my article, e.g., a website, the Chinese website do not archive old news reports. Instead one finds the website referenced has new stories featured that has nothing to do with my article. The old article referenced by me has disappeared and nowhere to be found. There is nothing I can do about this. On the other hand, international news sites such as CNN or NY Times has a distinct reference for each page of content featured. Reader can always see it even if the content is ten years old. I hope ScienceNet reader and the general public can urge these Chinese websites to change their practice. After all, these days computer memory to a first approximation cost nothing.
轉載本文請聯係原作者獲取授權,同時請注明本文來自何毓琦科學網博客。
鏈接地址:http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-1565-1029741.html
**
PPS: 本博網編者啟事 - - -
本博網欄目所有文章為記錄個人的雜感眉批啟示 - 為意識流、隨想錄、隨筆記、塗鴉紙、奔騰八方思緒,寫時就是思緒的千軍萬馬搶過獨木橋 - 寫下來的這點就是過了獨木橋的那幾個思緒軍馬。本個人隻記下幾個思緒軍馬, 不論對錯輕重緩急。
為本個人厘清思想緣起與延伸發展而附加注明轉載文章來源 (收集轉載文章為自學收藏), 轉載文章並不代表本網編者讚同其觀點和對其真實性負責。凡本網編者啟事注明版權所有的作品,網文章版權均屬於文學城/新浪網/科學網/人民網/TIME/NYT/CNBC/NPR/Google/HigherEducation/Science/Nature/Zihu/backChina/未名空間(mitbbs.com) 。凡署名作者的,版權則屬原作者或出版人所有。凡經本網編者轉載, 或作者不授權 - 經反映本博網編者會采用相應措施。
本博網編者園地個人點滴時空軌跡:滿足本個人不同時空 (on travel, on silent, with the public, being alone, staring the sky, feel blue) 閱讀需求,本個人探討國內國際動態,本個人版塊解讀態勢,呈現本個人立體環境。偶而在於傳遞更多信息(If you swing by for drop-in visit of my blog webpage)。歡迎關注評論指正轉載 - 本個人擇善固執, 因此不敬之處請原諒。
((擇善固執-- I've read many classic books of thinkers and some of them were read many times. Still feel not much has changed in me by reading those books. In the end, we are who we are, and intentional molding and self-help are of little use. Personality determines fate, and personality is of 90% hereditary, so our fate and destiny were pretty much decided when we were born.
Sorry for being little pessimistic. ))