閭丘露薇認為華裔抗議是反美情緒，《鏗鏘三人行》則顧左右而言它刻意回避事件本質。閭丘露薇和《鏗鏘三人行》的評論，都有很明顯的為JK洗地擦屁股的傾向，都是變相貶低華裔保護自身安全抵製種族歧視言論的合法行為。
相反，彭博社評論就比較客觀了。彭博社評論指出JK劇就是一個不該播放的節目 （ It’s an offensive segment, and one that Kimmel and his producers should never have allowed to air.）彭博社評論完全理解華裔憤怒的抗議，認為6歲小孩也不應該說出種族滅絕的叫囂（ it’s not hard to understand why the Chinese and Chinese-American communities were so upset. Nationally televised jokes about racial extermination, even when made by six- and seven-year-olds, are rarely funny, especially if they’re directed at you. Even though to Americans (and probably to Kimmel) it might sound over the top to claim a child was publically advocating genocide, that’s what many Chinese heard.）
同樣是新聞評論，都是就事論事，點評時事。對於JK劇言論的點評，彭博社評論員就不諱言其反人類種族主義的事實，而閭丘露薇和《鏗鏘三人行》卻昧著良心為JK開脫。
