個人資料
  • 博客訪問:
歸檔
正文

zt 不學不行:美國獨特的捐贈文明 2012-08-24 10:04:18

(2012-08-25 05:20:10) 下一個
不學不行:美國獨特的捐贈文明2012-08-24 10:04:18

美國獨特的捐贈文明

德和才,哪一個更為重要?如果你隻能選擇其一,你會放棄哪位?無論你嘴上怎麽樣唱高調,中國目前的現實,就是在打造一代代的無德,或許有時候倒是有點才的“精英”。有才無德隻能是小人,這樣的人為主體的國度,當然是不可能玩轉團隊合作這盤大棋的。這,可能就是中國人一直缺乏團隊合作意識的根本所在吧。

在這裏,有一個更為重要的問題是:怎麽樣才能夠打造德?怎麽樣才能夠實現修身養性?難道靠的就是一個個偉大的口號?孫中山做了,毛澤東也做了,效果呢?他們自己到底又做的怎麽樣呢?回答這樣的問題,曆史自會給出良好的答案。

在美國,有一種看不見但卻非常實在的捐贈文明存在。我覺得,就是這種文明和文化,在潛移默化,無形之中,時時刻刻的,熏陶我們的靈魂,造就我們境界的清新。而這樣的捐贈文化和傳統,在中國曆史上好像就從來都沒有出現過,也不太可能在可預見的未來出現。

遠的已經失憶,就談最近幾個月的事情。每個星期,都會有陌生人打來電話,語氣客氣、優雅,目的也非常明確:你能不能為我們的退伍老兵,或者紅十字會什麽的慈善機構,捐贈點你不怎麽用的衣物?

有幾次,我都和對方開玩笑:你們天天來要,我再多的存貨也會耗盡。

你這樣說的時候,對方的老太太會更為客氣的回答說:對不起,我能夠理解。那還是下次再試吧。

在這種時候,我是沒有辦法拒接給予的。長此以往的結果,當然就是讓大量的零售店得益:因為,我們會不得不為了捐贈衣物而添置新衣物。能夠做到這點,也還是得益於大量中國人的犧牲,是他們的犧牲,讓我們能夠在美國花很低的價錢去舊換新,因此,也才有可以捐贈的貨物。

很多時候,我們幹脆就將不怎麽愛穿的,不管是新的(許多連標簽都還在)還是舊的,都來個“順水推舟”,送了人情。走到今天這樣的習慣,還是我們家老婆長期以來的言傳身教的結果。在過去很多年,隻是她一個人在“打點”自己和孩子的衣物。最近,卻是輪到我了。也因此,我獲得了大量的空間可以被用在更需要的方麵。 仔細想想,每個星期好幾次的好幾大包給予,一年下來,確實也是很巨大的數量。

有時候,想想這許多質量不錯的衣服,再想想還有那麽多的中國同胞,很可能一輩子都沒有機會享受這種質量的中國產品,內心能夠有的,除了對美國捐贈文化的敬意之外,也隻能是一份內心深處的悲涼而已。想想幾個月之前,為了捐出幾萬元價值的書籍購買款(是實實在在的票子,就是因為限定了隻能購買書籍,對方就缺少興趣!再者,可能就是嫌數目太小?!),走了一大圈,最終反倒感覺自己就是一個乞丐?!

美國的捐贈文化涉及的範圍非常的廣:工作的人,有在薪水裏麵捐贈,並且獲得來自公司支持的( Match );交稅的時候,還有一個小框問你是不是樂意付出區區一美元的?即使你上店裏麵買東西,有的地方還會問你,是不是樂意將零錢捐出去?

在美國,最普及和最常規的部分,最大的捐贈,除了來自薪水直接扣除的外,恐怕就是大量普通人,在各個教堂進行的“盡力而為”的捐贈了。

有意思的是,美國佬有時候還會請客:讓你和他們一起上他們的教堂,在那裏的屬於你的那份捐款的代付,就是他們給你的“請客”部分。我就這樣被善待了幾次,不過,我還是入鄉隨俗,來個 AA 製,好讓自己心安理得。對於我,感覺比實在更為實在。

為了政治而提供的捐款,就是目前這樣的時刻最叫響的部分了。那幾位總統候選人高達幾億、幾十億的競選資金,也是來自各種不同的捐贈。

在這個世界上,隻要有付出和接受,就有交換利益的空間存在。為此,美國製定了非常嚴格和相對合理的製約法律,讓利益交換的可能性變的最小。中國數千年下來的腐敗,實際上也是某種程度的“捐贈”下利益交換的結果。不同的,隻是有些部分被過度的放大了而已。而能夠做到這點的,也還是因為權力的不平衡,和法律製約力的微小。而後者又是“得益於”前者的存在而存在的。

不管形式如何,在美國所發生的捐贈,一切的一切都是你的自願。沒有人會讓你感覺偉大,也沒有人會讓你感覺難堪和低賤?!反過來,你去看看中國國內的情況:你在公交車上不讓座位(實際上也是一種捐贈——使用權的捐贈),你不僅會受到聲討和人肉追剿,還可能被人重重的扇下好幾個耳光。為此受虐,你還沒有反擊的權利。在那裏的一切,都是被迫的,那樣的捐贈文明,和搶劫到底有多大的區別?我是看不出的。

下麵這篇文章,談的是關於美國捐贈的統計數據。對於我們理解美國的這部分文化,有很大的啟發價值。

記住了,在美國生活,你還真的得慷慨點。如果你老是摳門,老是想著到處占便宜,算計他人,我看不出,你怎樣能夠融入美國文明,也不能想象出,你怎樣能夠融入美國主流。很多人談論融入主流,看的隻是自己“成就”方麵的“業績”,也就是你在這個生活所獲得的部分(索取),卻忽視了更為重要的付出和給予。你存在的價值,最重要的還是你的給予,你對他人的價值!

中國人和中國同胞,在談論融入主流時,別再自以為是,別再那麽功利性極重,別再那麽以小人之心,度君子之腹了。仔細的深入美國的文明,仔細地看看,普通美國人的真實活法,然後,再開你那“高貴”的尊口吧?!否則,也隻能是自己作踐自己。

America’s Most (and Least) Generous States

August 22, 2012

A report released on charitable giving this week shows that the residents of some states appear to be far more generous than others. The average Utah household earning more than $50,000 a year gave more than 10% of its disposable income, while similarly situated New Hampshire residents gave less than 3% of their income. Based on The Chronicle of Philanthropy’s latest data, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed the most and least generous states in the country.

The states that give the most appear to have more residents in need. Seven of the 10 most charitable states also have among the 10-highest proportions of families living below the poverty level. In Mississippi, where the median charitable donation was 7.2% of discretionary income — the second-highest in the country — nearly 20% of families live below the poverty line, the nation’s highest rate.

The presence of very high-income households appeared to reduce the percent of discretionary income residents gave. Only one of the 20 states with the largest proportion of residents earning $200,000 or more were among the 10 most generous states. This makes sense, explained Peter Panepento, assistant managing editor of The Chronicle of Philanthropy, in an interview with 24/7 Wall St. He explained that “Those who are at the higher income levels give more money, but they tend to give at a lower percentage of their income because their incomes are so much higher.”

However, the wealthy are more likely to make charitable donations when exposed to poverty. According to an earlier study conducted by The Chronicle of Philanthropy, households that earned more than $200,000 a year gave on average 4.2% of their median discretionary income. But when those wealthy households lived in highly concentrated areas of wealthy people, where more than 40% of the zipcode earned more than $200,000 a year, they gave only 2.8%. “So,” Panepento explained, “there’s some thought that the more you’re exposed to the needs of your community, the more compelled you are to give.”

The presence of religion appeared to have the strongest relationship to charitable donations. Of the 10 states that gave the most, eight were among the 10 states with the highest percentage of residents reporting going to church, synagogue, or mosque on a weekly basis, based on a Gallup survey. The reverse was true of the least charitable states. New Hampshire, the state that gave the least, also had the lowest percentage of residents reporting attending religious services. Panepento explained that this “was particularly the case in Utah, where the Mormon church is a major force, and where tithing is a big part of that state’s culture.”

The Chronicle of Philanthropy measured charitable giving by households that earned more than $50,000 in 2008. The group calculated how much discretionary income those households had, based on income, taxes and the cost of living in the state. They then compared discretionary income to the median charitable donation, to determine how much residents donated relative to how much they could afford. In addition to these data, 24/7 Wall St. reviewed median household income, the percent of families living below the poverty line and the percent of households earning more than $200,000 from the U.S. Census Bureau. We relied on a 2009 Gallup survey for the percent of residents in each state that attended a religious service on a weekly basis. The percentage of 2010 tax filers who reported a charitable donation was obtained from the Internal Revenue Service.

These are America’s Most (and Least) Generous States

America’s 10 Most Generous States

10. Maryland
> Pct. of income donated: 5.7%
> Total charitable contributions: $3.9 billion (11th highest)
> Median contribution: $2,969 (13th highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 9.7% (3rd highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 6.6% (2nd lowest)

Maryland’s median household income of $68,854 is the highest in the U.S., and the percentage of households making more than $200,000 a year, at 9.7%, is the third highest in the country. While Maryland is the only state on this list with a median contribution below $3,000, it may be because residents spend more than most on taxes. Marylanders pay $5,217.64 per capita in state and local taxes, the fifth highest in the U.S. and the highest on this list by a hefty $1,634.92.

9. North Carolina
> Pct. of income donated: 5.9%
> Total charitable contributions: $4.3 billion (9th highest)
> Median contribution: $3,132 (11th highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 3.6% (24th highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 13.3% (11th highest)

North Carolina may have one of highest unemployment rates in the country at 9.6%, but residents of this state are still some of the most generous in the country. The giving is also relatively consistent throughout the population with 28.9% of tax returns filing for charitable donations — the 15th-highest percentage in the country. Like many of the most generous states, North Carolina has a church attendance that is also among the highest in the country. 53% of North Carolinians reported going to church, synagogue or mosque at least once a week compared to the 41.6% national average. Three of the most generous cities in the U.S. reporting the most donations per 1,000 people also happen to be located in the Tar Heel state: Cary, Raleigh, and Durham.

8. Georgia
> Pct. of income donated: 6.2%
> Total charitable contributions: $4.8 billion (6th highest)
> Median contribution: $3,396 (7th highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 4.2% (19th highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 13.7% (9th highest)

Georgia has among the highest percent of families living below the poverty line and the fifth-highest unemployment rate. The giving in this state is fairly consistent across the population — Georgia ranks 12th for the percentage of tax returns filed with charitable donations listed at 29.7%. Georgia is a fairly religious state — 51% of residents report going to church, synagogue or mosque at least once a week, among the highest in the country.

7. Arkansas
> Pct. of income donated: 6.3%
> Total charitable contributions: $1 billion (18th lowest)
> Median contribution: $3,554 (5th highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 2.3% (3rd lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 14.1% (6th highest)

Like many of the most generous states, Arkansas is one of the poorer states in the country. The median household income is the third lowest in the country at $38,307, and the percentage of households with a median income over $200,000 is less than half the national average of 5.1%. While the percentage of discretionary income donated was one of the highest in the country, Arkansas had the seventh-lowest percentage of tax returns filed with charitable donations listed. The amount, 19.2%, is less than half the amount of Maryland, the state with the highest percentage of tax returns listing charitable donations, although Marylanders gave less as a percent of their discretionary income.

6. Idaho
> Pct. of income donated: 6.4% (tied-fifth)
> Total charitable contributions: $639 million (14th lowest)
> Median contribution: $3,155 (10th highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 2.3% (4th lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 11.6% (19th highest)

Idaho ties with South Carolina for being the fifth most generous state in the nation. According to a 2006 study by Philanthropy Northwest, 69% of all charitable donations in Idaho went towards education related charities. This is an appropriate focus for a state that had the second lowest spending per a pupil at $7,106. The national average for pupil spending was $10,615. Residents may think they have more to donate because Idaho is a downright cheap place to live. The cost of living index for Idaho is the sixth lowest in U.S.

5. South Carolina
> Pct. of income donated: 6.4% (tied-fifth)
> Total charitable contributions: $2 billion (25th highest)
> Median contribution: $3,429 (6th highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 2.9% (11th lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 13.8% (8th highest)

South Carolina is a state buffeted by economic problems. The state’s 9.6% unemployment rate is tied for fifth highest in the U.S. and well above the national rate of 8.3%. The state also has among the highest percentage of residents on food stamps (14.5%) and families living below the poverty line (13.8%). Nevertheless, 25.8% of South Carolina residents filed tax returns with charitable contributions, collectively giving 6.4% of their discretionary income. Like many generous states, South Carolina is deeply religious, with 56% of the population going to church, synagogue or mosque at least once a week, the fourth highest proportion in the U.S.

4. Tennessee
> Pct. of income donated: 6.6%
> Total charitable contributions: $2.7 billion (16th highest)
> Median contribution: $3,807 (4th highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 3.4% (22nd lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 13.4% (10th highest)

Unlike states such as South Carolina and Georgia, where more than a quarter of the people filed for charitable contribution deductions, less than one in five of Tennesseans filed taxes with a contribution. Nevertheless, those who did donate gave a median contribution of $3,807, the fourth highest of all states. Low taxes and low cost of living may be encouraging some Tennesseans to donate. The 7.6% state and local tax burden is the fourth-lowest in the country. Meanwhile, the state also has the lowest overall cost of living and the lowest cost of living for housing.

3. Alabama
> Pct. of income donated: 7.1%
> Total charitable contributions: $2.3 billion (21st highest)
> Median contribution: $4,007 (2nd highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 2.9% (12th lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 14.7% (3rd highest)

Alabama is a deeply religious state, with 58% of the population going to church, synagogue or mosque at least once a week, which is highly indicative of a giving culture. A quarter of the people in the state filed tax returns with charitable contributions, and the median contribution was $4,007 — the only state except for Utah with a median contribution above $4,000. But since the Chronicle of Philanthropy survey only measured donations for households who make more than $50,000, it may have missed many people in Alabama who don’t make nearly enough to qualify for this measurement. Most notably, 14.7% of families live below the poverty line, the third highest rate among all states.

2. Mississippi
> Pct. of income donated: 7.2%
> Total charitable contributions: $1.1 billion (19th lowest)
> Median contribution: $3,998 (3rd highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 2.1% (2nd lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 17.8% (the highest)

Mississippi has the lowest median income in the country at $36,851 and highest percentage of families living below the poverty line at 17.8%. But that doesn’t keep the residents from being generous with what they do have. Religion likely influences how residents donate. Mississippians are avid church-goers — 63% of residents went to church, synagogue or mosque once a week, the highest percentage in the country.

1. Utah
> Pct. of income donated: 10.6%
> Total charitable contributions: $2.4 billion (20th highest)
> Median contribution: $5,225 (the highest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 3.5% (24th lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 9.7% (24th lowest)

Utah isn’t by any means the richest state in the U.S. The median income of $54,744 is right around the national median of $50,046. Nevertheless, Utahns donated 10.6% of their discretionary income to charity — the highest rate of any state by sizable 3.4 percentage points. Also, more than a third (33.4%) of the population claimed a charitable contribution on their taxes. High amounts of charitable giving is a product of the fact that a majority of Utahns are Mormon - more than 62% of Utah’s population is affiliated with the Mormon Church, according to The Salt Lake Tribune. Funded by tithing, the church asks members to give 10% of their income “to move forward the work of the church.”

America’s 10 Least Generous States

10. Nevada
> Pct. of income donated: 3.9%
> Total charitable contributions: $952 million (16th lowest)
> Median contribution: $1,978 (9th lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 3.7% (23rd highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 11.1% (21st highest)

Nevadans are lightly taxed, paying just 7.5% of their income in state and local taxes — the second-smallest tax burden in the U.S. Still, residents of the state were among the worst givers in the country, as the state’s median contribution was less than $2,000. One issue that may contribute to this low figure is religion. Just 30% of Nevadans were regularly involved in religious services, the lowest proportion in the nation outside New England.

9. New Jersey
> Pct. of income donated: 3.7%
> Total charitable contributions: $4.5 billion (8th highest)
> Median contribution: $2,181 (14th lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 10.6% (the highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 7.8% (10th lowest)

New Jersey residents like to donate, with 36.6% filing tax returns claiming a deduction for charitable contributions. However, donations remain modest. At only 3.7% of discretionary income, charitable donations as a percentage of discretionary income are far lower than most states. In fairness, New Jerseyans have it hard, faced with a collective 12.2% state and local tax burden, the highest in the country. While the state is not the most religious in the country, it’s pious compared to much of the Northeast. 38% of New Jersey residents attended church, synagogue or mosque at least once a week, compared to less than one-third of residents in Rhode Island (32%), Connecticut (32%), Massachusetts (30%), Vermont (23%), Maine (27%) and New Hampshire (26%).

8. North Dakota
> Pct. of income donated: 3.5%
> Total charitable contributions: $164 million (the lowest)
> Median contribution: $2,257 (17th lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 3.1% (13th lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 7.8% (9th lowest)

North Dakota’s total charitable contributions by households earning over $50,000 a year was the absolute smallest, at $164 million. In addition to the state’s modest population, relatively few residents listed a charitable deduction on their tax returns — at 14.7%, it was second-lowest proportion in the country. Though the state’s median income was slightly below the national median, North Dakotans are not especially poor. Just 7.8% of families lived below the poverty line, among the lowest percentage in the U.S., while 8.2% of households required food stamps, below the 11.9% national average. Additionally, North Dakota’s July unemployment rate was just 3%, well under the national rate of 8.3% and the lowest in the country.

7. Wisconsin
> Pct. of income donated: 3.4%
> Total charitable contributions: $2 billion (25th lowest)
> Median contribution: $1,747 (6th lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 3.3% (17th lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 9.1% (17th lowest)

Wisconsin is one of just two Midwestern states that are on the list of the least generous states in the country. Maybe this lack of propensity for giving is due to an above average tax burden on individuals in the Badger state. The average state and local tax burden of 11% in Wisconsin is the fourth highest in the country. Or, maybe it has something to do with the above average equality in the state as compared to the rest of the country. The one-year Gini coefficient for Wisconsin is the sixth lowest in the country, meaning that the divide between the rich and poor is relatively narrow.

6. Connecticut
> Pct. of income donated: 3.3%
> Total charitable contributions: $2.3 billion (22nd highest)
> Median contribution: $1,916 (7th lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 10.3% (2nd highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 7.2% (5th lowest)

Connecticut is among the wealthiest states in the country. Median income was $64,032, compared to the national median income of $50,046, and 10.3% of households earned over $200,000 a year, the second-highest proportion among all states in the U.S. Despite this wealth, the median contribution to charity by those earning over $50,000 was just $1,916 per year — the seventh-lowest figure nationally. Residents may be deterred from giving to charity by a higher tax burden, as 12% of income went to state and local taxes, the third-highest nationally. Connecticut also had the fourth-highest cost of living in the U.S.

5. Rhode Island
> Pct. of income donated: 3.1%
> Total charitable contributions: $351 million (8th lowest)
> Median contribution: $1,666 (5th lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 5.4% (13th highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 9.2% (20th lowest)

More than 30% of Rhode Islanders filed a charitable contribution on their income taxes. But of filers making $50,000 or more the median contribution was just $1,666, or 3.1% of discretionary income. The state continues to struggle with an economy that has been in decline for some time. The state’s 10.8% unemployment rate in July is the second-highest in the U.S. and well above the national rate of 8.3%. Rhode Island also has among the highest cost of living and the fifth-highest state and local tax burden, at 10.7%. Rhode Island’s 32% weekly rate attendance at churches, synagogues or mosques is higher than most of its New England peers, but about 20 percentage points below many of the most generous states.

4. Massachusetts
> Pct. of income donated: 2.8%
> Total charitable contributions: $3.1 billion (14th highest)
> Median contribution: $1,652 (4th lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 9% (4th highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 8.2% (13th lowest)

Massachusetts residents are hardly poor. The state’s $62,072 annual median income was more than $10,000 more than the national median. And just three states had a higher proportion of residents who earned over $200,000 a year than Massachusetts. Still, residents earning $50,000 or more gave just 2.8% of their discretionary income to charity. Limited religious participation may contribute to this, as just 29% of individuals surveyed by Gallup reported they frequently attended religious services. Another deterrent may be Massachusetts’ 10% state and local tax burden, which was one of the nation’s highest.

3. Vermont
> Pct. of income donated: 2.8%
> Total charitable contributions: $166 million (2nd lowest)
> Median contribution: $1,548 (3rd lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 3.9% (22nd highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 8.4% (14th lowest)

While the state’s median household income is just slightly lower than the national median, only 21.4% of the population filed for a charitable contribution on their taxes, one of the lowest percentage in the country. For those who did file and made more than $50,000, the median contribution was only $1,548, which is less than one-third of the median contribution of most generous state. While the state and local tax burden of 10.2% is the eighth highest in the U.S., religion could explain this discrepancy. Only 23% of the population reported going regularly to church, synagogue or mosque, the lowest of all 50 states.

2. Maine
> Pct. of income donated: 2.8%
> Total charitable contributions: $308 million (6th lowest)
> Median contribution: $1,403 (the lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 2.8% (7th lowest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 8.8% (15th lowest)

Among Mainers earning in excess of $50,000 a year, the median contribution to charity was just $1,403, the lowest figure nationally by nearly $100. Residents are not especially wealthy; the state’s median household income was only $45,815, well below the $50,046 national median. Additionally 16.2% of households received food stamps, the sixth-highest figure nationwide. Meanwhile, just 2.8% of households earned more than $200,000, far less than the 5.1% who did nationally. Despite these figures, Maine had a state and local tax burden of 10.1% of per capita income, a higher figure than wealthier states such as Massachusetts and Maryland.

1. New Hampshire
> Pct. of income donated: 2.5%
> Total charitable contributions: $409 million (11th lowest)
> Median contribution: $1,497 (2nd lowest)
> Pct. households $200,000+ income: 5.7% (12th highest)
> Pct. families in poverty: 5.3% (the lowest)

The percentage of residents filing for charitable contributions in New Hampshire, 26.7%, was much less than many other New England States such as Connecticut (36.3%), Massachusetts (32.5%) and Rhode Island (30.1%). Unlike many of the least generous states, New Hampshire residents can’t claim they pay higher taxes than most. The state and local tax burden of 8% was the seventh lowest in the U.S. In addition, while the state had the 10th highest cost of living, states such as Connecticut and New Jersey had higher costs of living while also giving more to charity. Like many states, the tie between charitable contribution and religion is apparent — only 26% of New Hampshire residents reported going to church, synagogue or mosque weekly, the second-lowest rate in the country.

Michael B. Sauter, Lisa Uible, Samuel Weigley and Alexander E. M. Hess

評論(4)引用瀏覽(1158)
發表評論
文章評論
作者:好同學留言時間:2012-08-24 11:20:22
您把捐贈想得太複雜了,其實簡單得很,也沒有那麽高尚的境界。
大部分人捐贈都是因為經濟上允許,有多餘自己用不著的東西,不捐出去反而在家裏占地方,或者原有的東西已過時想更新換代,或者搬家運費比買新東西還貴,或者小孩子已經長大他的衣物玩具都用不著了,等等原因。
實際上中國的捐贈也逐漸流行。這些年我親戚家就捐出很多東西,像什麽老式家具,棉被,衣服,電視,收音機,等等。人們生活提高了嗎,要趕潮流嗎。這在二三十年前是不可能的,那時日子過得很緊不可能捐嗎。
作者:西岸留言時間:2012-08-24 16:42:41
這事情其實沒有那麽複雜和什麽高尚多少的,看看第一段就能比較出來了,猶他州之所以排在第一是因為這是摩門教會要求教徒必須交出10%的收入作為會費的原因,猶他有75%的居民是摩門教徒。因此這是屬於教會”強製“的,除非你不想在教會內被人看不起,當年在鹽湖城參觀摩門教總部的時候就發現了這個非常可惡的事情。
而對教會的捐錢可以作為對慈善組織的捐贈,因此可以免稅,這就是為什麽如今競爭總統的共和黨候選人羅姆尼師傅的稅率比各類稅率裏最低的15%的投資收益稅還要低,隻有14%不到的原因,因為交了10%的收入給摩門教會,盡了教徒的基本義務,還把給政府的稅降了下來,反正這些錢不給摩門教也是給政府,而給教會既有名聲又有實惠。
對於大宗捐款的人來講都是通過計算稅率的方式來決定捐款的數額,如今美國慈善組織整體接受的錢不夠了,也是因為人們的收入因為經濟危機而降低,捐款失去了降低稅率的可能。
衣服或家具電器什麽的,一般家庭都是通過捐助來扔掉,這比擺個yard sale要合適的多,省很多時間和精力。大宗東西人家上門來拿,省了運費。這些東西對你是沒有什麽用途,但救世軍之類的可以賣給窮人,對救世軍這類慈善機構是個收益,對窮人也是便宜。一般家裏每年隨便就會捐掉至少上百件衣服,尤其是有孩子的家庭,每次back to school,總要有不少可能就穿過一次的衣服”過時“。
美國的優點是任何事情都是發展成為一個生意,捐贈也是如此,許多非贏利組織是依靠這個活著的。因為所謂的非贏利,是指機構不是以盈利為目的,但並不是說其工作人員不掙錢,你捐助的不論是錢還是物中有百分之好幾十是給這些人發工資和其他消費的,比如旅行,而真正用於慈善的比例可能不到10%,這是幾年前電視專題的一個節目揭露的。這就是為什麽經濟危機開始後,美國開始出現大量的”非贏利組織“,任何一個個人都可以以什麽高尚的名義來建立,比如幫助南美窮孩子上學,廣告上說你隻需平均每天捐27美分就可以幫助一個孩子。後來被揭露其用於孩子的錢隻有5%左右,其他都被其組織揮霍(這個廣告至今偶爾還能在電視上看到,因為並不違法)。
美國大概就是美國紅十字會把overhead控製在10%左右,其他的慈善機構的overhead從40-95%的水平。
在商品社會裏,商業化的東西是最可能持續的,這就是美國慈善事業的優勢,本身是商業行為,但隻要不以盈利為目的,政府也就不能收稅(但其個人的收入是要打稅的)。
這樣你來看摩門教會要求教徒必須交10%的收入給教會就成了投資的性質,教會可以用這筆錢來影響政治(比如對加州8號公投僅一次就投入了兩千五百萬廣告費,成為左右這個公投的主要原因),從而增大教會的影響。
就是通過事實上摩門教徒合法減稅得到的錢來用於摩門教的私利,這種行為從道德角度是說不過去的,但合法。
至於那種付款時要求捐一塊錢幫助什麽治療癌症的事情,如果你想拒絕的話,可以拒絕,這在美國是非常普遍的。但對於一些人來說,可能有麵子上的原因而不好拒絕,比如排在你後麵的人都看得見。這類現象也有過專門的研究,記得甚至有過官司,認為這種利用人們注重麵子的心理而誘使捐款的方式不合法,後來也不了了之。
但你是可以堂而皇之拒絕的,這也是美國社會的好處,你的生活不是他人可以幹涉的。人們對於這個方式募捐的一個抵觸原因也是其募捐結果是不透明的,商店說是幫助治療癌症基金,但你無法知道其overhead是多少,也許就是給自己發獎金了。就是並不在於我捐了多少錢,而是你怎麽用這筆錢?
但總的來說,這種錢都是小錢,你買幾十刀的東西並不在乎多付一塊錢。捐款更多的時候是幫助自己的心理平衡,特別是救災的名義,所謂救急不救窮的概念。
美國過去有過一個比較,教徒集中的地方捐款比例高,這是宗教文化的因素。那麽你再看密西西比比東北部知識水平高,文化自由度高的New Hampshire的捐款比例高就很容易理解了,因為這是教會生活的一個特點,曆史上羅馬教會也是發行過”贖罪券“的,總的概念就是花錢買未來。
這種現象其實在教會,不論什麽教會都是商業行為的性質,是教會賴以在商業社會生存的方式,但在教徒並不是這麽認為的,而是個人與上帝的事。
再對比中國就可以看出問題在什麽地方了。中國的個人和企業對慈善事業的捐款是不可以減稅的(至少幾年前是這樣),記得當時與國內來的一個有錢人談論這個問題的時候他說他也願意捐款扶植什麽,但政府不許減稅,因此就沒有積極性。
但政府這麽做也並非沒有道理,因為捐款本身在一個法製不完善的社會裏是逃稅的最好方式。你捐了一百萬,對方收到後給你五百萬的收據,你向政府少報四百萬的稅。如果政府缺乏核實慈善組織的實際獲款額度的能力(比如有境外問題或銀行轉賬監督不完善),那麽這就成功地給四百萬逃稅或甚至是洗錢(如果是黑錢的話)。
美國從慈善事業的鼻祖卡內基梅隆開始,就定義了”慈善事業是富人根據自己的意願來改造世界的方式“的概念,就是有錢自己花,而不是由政府花。
這樣就可以理解為什麽比爾蓋茨說要把全部錢都捐出去的原因(他隻給孩子每人留了七千五百萬),因為其捐款都是捐給了自己的基金會,用於非洲的疾病和衛生條件的改善。如果他全部留給孩子,在這個級別的遺產稅是75%,那麽絕大多數錢會給了政府。
因此在其死後,不論怎麽樣,這些錢也都是自己的人控製,包括其後代。
就是捐款其實是個主觀為自己,客觀為他人的性質。而這個事情要想成功,前提是使這個事情商業化,和對政府的遊說。
因此這是無關什麽”德“的概念,而是基於最大限度的利用資源降低成本的商業概念。
在美國有一個事情必須清楚,就是任何一件事要想成功和能持續,必須是發展成為商業行為,因為美國是世界上商業化程度最高的社會,非商業化的東西是很難維持的,教會是如此,如今美國的國防是如此,包括軍隊。
那麽捐款和慈善事業也是不例外的。
作者:中西部人留言時間:2012-08-24 21:48:26
汪翔你剛剛到美國的吧。對美國也太不了解了。捐贈是避稅的手段。當年克林頓要競選總統是他的稅單被放到全國人民麵前。他把舊的內褲計算5美元用來捐贈,這些都是減稅的把戲啊。
作者:中西部人留言時間:2012-08-24 22:00:08
大家應該知道美國的United way吧。華人上任第一天,趙小蘭宣布自己的年薪為前任的一半,從39萬美元減為19.5 萬美元。她還下達指示,以後出差所有人一律坐普通經濟艙。她本人平常也不坐公用車。中午午餐,趙小蘭吃的是極為樸素的紙袋午餐。這不僅是為了節省開支,也是為了與揮霍無度的前任區別開來。
[ 打印 ]
閱讀 ()評論 (0)
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.