正文
肢解印度，是印度周邊國家的共同的意誌
從印度周邊國家的各種報導(以下是比較概括的一篇)可以結論：肢解印度，是印度周邊國家的共同的意誌。 中國應該怎麽辦？
The New Nation – Bangladesh’s independent News source
Internet Edition. August 9, 2009, Updated: Bangladesh Time 12:00 AM
Indian fault lines
Mohammad Jamil
During the recorded history of 3000 years, India has never been a 'cohesive unit' except for brief period vis-a-vis during Ashoka era for 41 years, Aurangzeb Alamgir era for 49 years and finally British Raj for 89 years. There was of course difference in the way those governments conducted them to have semblance of unity. In fact, the term 'Indian sub-continent' signifies having certain geographical or political independence from the rest of the continent. However, sociologists are of the firm opinion that Indian caste system had blighted India, which did not allow formation of 'One India' for centuries. Some ascribe the reason to different backgrounds of the people their languages and cultures. According to 1931 census by the British Indian government, there were more than 350 languages, and scores of cultures. But language and cultural diversity is not the reason for 'many Indians'. Take the case of China that has also many languages and dialects but yet it is one China.
Maloy Krishna Dhar, a former bureaucrat, police official and who was inducted in Central Intelligence Bureau, in his treatise Indian Fault Lines: Perceptions and realities has given the detailed analysis of perceptions of various problems in the country and the real situation on the ground. He writes: "India is perhaps the only country that has simultaneous presence of ethnic insurgency, ideological terrorism and religious jihad waged by foreign-based tanzeems and sponsored by foreign intelligence agencies and great social divide." He however conveniently forgets the role of the RAW in stoking and fuelling insurgencies in neighbouring countries, especially Pakistan. He forgets that India had played an ignominious role in the dismemberment of Pakistan. He tried to justify the barbaric acts by Hindutva organisations on the basis of misperceived danger from the alleged accretion in Muslim demography, illegal Bangladeshi infiltration and Muslim separatism as serious threats to India's national integrity.
Like other Indian writers and intellectuals, he blamed Pakistan, China, Myanmar and Bangladesh for fuelling insurgencies in India - Naga Territory, Assam, Tripura and Kamtapur movement in West Bengal, Manipur, Mizoram and other areas, what the author described as 'Outer India'. "Average literate Indians are generally aware about the Naxal or Maoist movements raging in a well visible Red-Corridor right from West Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. Between last two years more areas in Maharashtra, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu and Kerala have come under Maoist action." The author focused on external factors but did not realise that Maoists' movement is a popular movement and Maoists have massive support of the people for their programme and ideology.
Recently, Indian para-military forces have stepped up operation against insurgents in Lalgarh tribal region of West Bengal and the combing operation continues in the nearby villages. In the wake of this insurgency, the Central government of India last Monday banned the Communist Party of India (Maoist), terming it a terrorist organisation. It invoked Section 41 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act against the extremist outfit. Many States, including Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, had declared the CPI (Maoist) an unlawful association and a terrorist organisation. Bihar, Orissa, Jharkhand and Tamil Nadu had done so under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. In these eastern regions, Naxalites have established their writ running large in hundreds of villages. The CPI (Maoist) is now clubbed with other banned terror groups such as the Pakistan-based Lashkar-i-Taiba and the Sri Lankan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, with its offices and bank accounts sealed.
In the past India has banned violent Hindu fronts such as the Ranvir Sena and the Bajrang Dal, while there is a continuing debate about taking action against Right Wing Hindu political organisations such as the Shiv Sena and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad. It appears that India would not take on Hindu extremist organisations because they can use them to create frenzy against Pakistan. The Maoist rebels oppose the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist) government in Bengal, though reports increasingly point towards a personal vendetta in the villages. Though the Maoists have snatched the weapons from the security personnel, the government has started a whispering campaign hinting that they have links with Nepal and support from China have also been spoken of.
According to South Asia Terrorism Portal's report 2007, "at least 231 of the country's 608 ' districts were afflicted, at differing intensities, by various insurgent and terrorist movements. Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir (12 out of the 14 districts), in different states of the Northeast (54 districts) and Left Wing extremism (affecting at least 165 districts in 14 states) continued to pose serious challenges to the country's security framework. In addition, wide areas of the country appear to have 'fallen off the map' of good governance, and are acutely susceptible to violent political mobilisation, lawlessness and organised criminal activity." In this backdrop one can conclude that India is awash with home-grown terrorist organisations and can implode from within without any outside effort.
India's neighbours - Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives and Pakistan-are the witness to its hegemonic designs. India is trying to emulate America - the sole superpower, which wants to run the world according to its whim and fancy. India considers itself as a regional power and arrogates to itself the role of determining the extent of independence and sovereignty of its neighbours. Such bullying attitude is often witnessed when it deals with its neighbours. Since Pakistan does not accept India's hegemony in the region and is not willing to forego its right over Kashmir, India is trying to weaken Pakistan and its armed forces, and RAW, MOSSAD and CIA are reported to have coalesced because of convergence of their interests. They have tried their best to weaken Pakistan's security forces and its premier agency but the latter understood the game plan, and the strategy they formulated has outmanoeuvred the enemies of Pakistan. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh during his first stint while addressing the interstate conferenceo had said that the biggest threat to India is the Maoists. The fact remains that the Naxalite movement is a growing threat, as 13 out of 28 states are now affected in one way or another by the insurgency. Because of inept policies of the Indian government law and order situation in Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, West Bengal, western Orissa and Bihar is hopeless. India also faces insurgencies in Nagaland. Mizoram, Assam, Bodol and, Manipur and Tripura where it is using heavy-handed methods and brutal force to quell the unrest, which in fact, has been censured by human rights organisations including Amnesty International.
It would be appropriate to conclude this article by quoting the author who concluded his treatise by writing: "We live in 'Many Indias' - India of the Dalit Hindus and Buddhists, India of the Hindu Backward and Other Backward Classes, Upper Caste Hindus, Scheduled Caste Hindus, ethnic tribals, linguistic diversities and of course, fresh demands from the Muslims to give general reservation to them or at least to the SC, Dalit and BC, OBC Muslims. Are we in the process of having 'Many Indias' and permanently 'losing 'One India' for which the Indians fought against the British? Are we reverting back to an India that was divided into different polities with fragile geographic and cultural bonds in the 9th and 10th century? How long the present fragile constitutional bonds would hold together? The perception of 'Asamudra Himachal' Bharat appears to be folklore."
從印度周邊國家的各種報導(以下是比較概括的一篇)可以結論：肢解印度，是印度周邊國家的共同的意誌。 中國應該怎麽辦？
The New Nation – Bangladesh’s independent News source
Internet Edition. August 9, 2009, Updated: Bangladesh Time 12:00 AM
Indian fault lines
Mohammad Jamil
During the recorded history of 3000 years, India has never been a 'cohesive unit' except for brief period vis-a-vis during Ashoka era for 41 years, Aurangzeb Alamgir era for 49 years and finally British Raj for 89 years. There was of course difference in the way those governments conducted them to have semblance of unity. In fact, the term 'Indian sub-continent' signifies having certain geographical or political independence from the rest of the continent. However, sociologists are of the firm opinion that Indian caste system had blighted India, which did not allow formation of 'One India' for centuries. Some ascribe the reason to different backgrounds of the people their languages and cultures. According to 1931 census by the British Indian government, there were more than 350 languages, and scores of cultures. But language and cultural diversity is not the reason for 'many Indians'. Take the case of China that has also many languages and dialects but yet it is one China.
Maloy Krishna Dhar, a former bureaucrat, police official and who was inducted in Central Intelligence Bureau, in his treatise Indian Fault Lines: Perceptions and realities has given the detailed analysis of perceptions of various problems in the country and the real situation on the ground. He writes: "India is perhaps the only country that has simultaneous presence of ethnic insurgency, ideological terrorism and religious jihad waged by foreign-based tanzeems and sponsored by foreign intelligence agencies and great social divide." He however conveniently forgets the role of the RAW in stoking and fuelling insurgencies in neighbouring countries, especially Pakistan. He forgets that India had played an ignominious role in the dismemberment of Pakistan. He tried to justify the barbaric acts by Hindutva organisations on the basis of misperceived danger from the alleged accretion in Muslim demography, illegal Bangladeshi infiltration and Muslim separatism as serious threats to India's national integrity.
Like other Indian writers and intellectuals, he blamed Pakistan, China, Myanmar and Bangladesh for fuelling insurgencies in India - Naga Territory, Assam, Tripura and Kamtapur movement in West Bengal, Manipur, Mizoram and other areas, what the author described as 'Outer India'. "Average literate Indians are generally aware about the Naxal or Maoist movements raging in a well visible Red-Corridor right from West Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, Jharkhand, Chhattisgarh, Andhra Pradesh and Maharashtra. Between last two years more areas in Maharashtra, West Bengal and Tamil Nadu and Kerala have come under Maoist action." The author focused on external factors but did not realise that Maoists' movement is a popular movement and Maoists have massive support of the people for their programme and ideology.
Recently, Indian para-military forces have stepped up operation against insurgents in Lalgarh tribal region of West Bengal and the combing operation continues in the nearby villages. In the wake of this insurgency, the Central government of India last Monday banned the Communist Party of India (Maoist), terming it a terrorist organisation. It invoked Section 41 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act against the extremist outfit. Many States, including Andhra Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh, had declared the CPI (Maoist) an unlawful association and a terrorist organisation. Bihar, Orissa, Jharkhand and Tamil Nadu had done so under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. In these eastern regions, Naxalites have established their writ running large in hundreds of villages. The CPI (Maoist) is now clubbed with other banned terror groups such as the Pakistan-based Lashkar-i-Taiba and the Sri Lankan Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, with its offices and bank accounts sealed.
In the past India has banned violent Hindu fronts such as the Ranvir Sena and the Bajrang Dal, while there is a continuing debate about taking action against Right Wing Hindu political organisations such as the Shiv Sena and the Vishwa Hindu Parishad. It appears that India would not take on Hindu extremist organisations because they can use them to create frenzy against Pakistan. The Maoist rebels oppose the ruling Communist Party of India (Marxist) government in Bengal, though reports increasingly point towards a personal vendetta in the villages. Though the Maoists have snatched the weapons from the security personnel, the government has started a whispering campaign hinting that they have links with Nepal and support from China have also been spoken of.
According to South Asia Terrorism Portal's report 2007, "at least 231 of the country's 608 ' districts were afflicted, at differing intensities, by various insurgent and terrorist movements. Terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir (12 out of the 14 districts), in different states of the Northeast (54 districts) and Left Wing extremism (affecting at least 165 districts in 14 states) continued to pose serious challenges to the country's security framework. In addition, wide areas of the country appear to have 'fallen off the map' of good governance, and are acutely susceptible to violent political mobilisation, lawlessness and organised criminal activity." In this backdrop one can conclude that India is awash with home-grown terrorist organisations and can implode from within without any outside effort.
India's neighbours - Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives and Pakistan-are the witness to its hegemonic designs. India is trying to emulate America - the sole superpower, which wants to run the world according to its whim and fancy. India considers itself as a regional power and arrogates to itself the role of determining the extent of independence and sovereignty of its neighbours. Such bullying attitude is often witnessed when it deals with its neighbours. Since Pakistan does not accept India's hegemony in the region and is not willing to forego its right over Kashmir, India is trying to weaken Pakistan and its armed forces, and RAW, MOSSAD and CIA are reported to have coalesced because of convergence of their interests. They have tried their best to weaken Pakistan's security forces and its premier agency but the latter understood the game plan, and the strategy they formulated has outmanoeuvred the enemies of Pakistan. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh during his first stint while addressing the interstate conferenceo had said that the biggest threat to India is the Maoists. The fact remains that the Naxalite movement is a growing threat, as 13 out of 28 states are now affected in one way or another by the insurgency. Because of inept policies of the Indian government law and order situation in Chhattisgarh, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Eastern Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, West Bengal, western Orissa and Bihar is hopeless. India also faces insurgencies in Nagaland. Mizoram, Assam, Bodol and, Manipur and Tripura where it is using heavy-handed methods and brutal force to quell the unrest, which in fact, has been censured by human rights organisations including Amnesty International.
It would be appropriate to conclude this article by quoting the author who concluded his treatise by writing: "We live in 'Many Indias' - India of the Dalit Hindus and Buddhists, India of the Hindu Backward and Other Backward Classes, Upper Caste Hindus, Scheduled Caste Hindus, ethnic tribals, linguistic diversities and of course, fresh demands from the Muslims to give general reservation to them or at least to the SC, Dalit and BC, OBC Muslims. Are we in the process of having 'Many Indias' and permanently 'losing 'One India' for which the Indians fought against the British? Are we reverting back to an India that was divided into different polities with fragile geographic and cultural bonds in the 9th and 10th century? How long the present fragile constitutional bonds would hold together? The perception of 'Asamudra Himachal' Bharat appears to be folklore."
評論
目前還沒有任何評論
登錄後才可評論.
