This should be analogous to police officer’s liability

Police officers responding to emergencies generally have a degree of immunity from liability for accidents, but this immunity is not absolute. While they are not liable for ordinary negligence, they can be held liable for reckless conduct that endangers others. It is hard to detect people drowning, a lot of them don't struggle 

所有跟帖： 

• 警察的EXEMPTION OF LIABILITY其他地方的一般雇員是沒有的。 -borisg- ♂ (233 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:17:00

• 想訛錢唄，這男孩一看就是最少上中產家庭的孩子 -飛黎- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:20:18

• 查了一下，救生員被判以後，小孩家長接著告了社區，和社區管理公司，後果不知 -飛黎- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:56:15

• 沒有其他證據前，我們還是相信法律和法庭的判決吧 -sayyousayme- ♂ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:20:19

• 現在誰還敢在康州當救生員，高中大學的孩子掙個最低工資救了人還惹上官司 -飛黎- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 07:26:54

• +1 -隨風19- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 10:13:38

• +2。我相信會翻過來。犯罪必須有受害人，動機，行為，機會。他沒有動機，行為，不構成犯罪。 -無言無語無聲- ♀ (146 bytes) () 07/09/2025 postreply 10:35:19