這個比的是各校在所選幾個行業裏麵的總分量，若無理解錯的話

It favors big and comprehensive schools like Berkeley.

A small and niche school like Caltech would have no place in this ranking-- one way to adjust it is to rank Caltech on *relevant* career choices only, including Med and CS. By Caltech students' self-selection few of them would choose MBB, IB, or Law, so these career choices should be irrelevant when it comes to evaluating Caltech.

所有跟帖： 

• 而且CS 占極大比重 -成功的小猴子- ♀ (167 bytes) () 09/22/2023 postreply 21:02:29

• 對的，Finance weight 太低，H和UPenn 的人控製著整個美麗國的經濟 -Nebrasky- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/22/2023 postreply 21:09:22

• 幾家大廠產值是2-3萬億，IB和trading是1200億，差了20倍，我把比例設成4:1，沒虧待他們 -whaled- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/22/2023 postreply 21:22:01

• 產值有啥關係。在大廠的平均工資也不可能比MBB高8倍，錄取率也不可能低8倍。對個人來說，金貴在哪裏？ -phoenix05- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/22/2023 postreply 21:32:49

• 你沒搞懂我的算法，我是估計人頭，不是收入 -whaled- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/22/2023 postreply 22:09:26

• 是這樣的，對個體還要用學生數normalize。Caltech不在原數據源裏，如果按人數調整後會不錯的 -whaled- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/22/2023 postreply 21:04:36

• 我昨天也說了，這麽混合排沒意義，沒有學生同時對五個行業感興趣。五個行業分別來個排名才make sense. -phoenix05- ♀ (66 bytes) () 09/22/2023 postreply 21:04:37