對比語言與邏輯更容易看到邏輯學的空洞之處。

I never studied logic, but I still learnt math and physics well, and learnt them joyfully too.

Yet there is no way I could do that with a language.  I must acquire a language before I can compose an essay in it.

Which proves that the capability of working with logic is automatic and requires no external forms as a language does.

吾不是反對邏輯學，作為總結、歸納，提醒和強化一下邏輯的作用還是有意義的。但不能本末倒置，作繭自縛。

所有跟帖： 

• 正是。邏輯與語言不對立。但對有些人來說語能力的落後連累了他們的判斷能力。 -stonebench- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 09:00:37

• 邏輯=土壤; 語文=花朵Lack of clarity is due to logic, not writing. -TJKCB- ♀ (531 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 10:21:06

• 所以，你列反辣：）土壤是語言，邏輯是花朵 -stonebench- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 10:30:14

• no logic soil; no flowers.Logic is bone, writing is muscle. -TJKCB- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 10:39:21

• logic first, 語法 is after the fact, as 邏輯學is after 邏輯 -TJKCB- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/06/2023 postreply 10:46:39