這是一共八個非官方專家做的研究報告，大意是

當時世貿樓鋼材被高溫熔化所需要的高溫是飛機燃油和辦公室著火的溫度遠遠不夠的：

The temperatures required for the observed spherule-formation and evaporation of materials observed in the
WTC dust (table 1) are significantly higher than temperatures reachable by the burning of jet fuel and office
materials in the WTC buildings (table 2). The temperatures required to melt iron (1,538 °C) and molybdenum
(2,623 °C), and to vaporize lead (1,740 °C) and aluminosilicates (~2,760°C), are completely out of reach of the
fires in the WTC buildings (maximum 1,100 °C). We wish to call attention to this discrepancy: the official
view implicating fires as the main cause for the ultimate collapses of the WTC Towers and WTC 7 (FEMA
[13], NIST [15] ) is inadequate to explain this temperature gap and is therefore incomplete at best. The
formation of numerous metal-rich spherules is also remarkable, for it implies formation of high-temperature
droplets of the molten metals, dispersed in the air where they cool to form spherules. As displayed in figures 3
and 4, we observe spherules with high iron and aluminum contents, a chemical signature which is not consistent
with formation from melted s

 

文件鏈接：
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/WTCHighTemp2.pdf

我沒時間看全部，也看不懂。有興趣的可以讀一下。

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 真心喜歡你們的輕聲細語~~~ -Vivian32817- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 16:46:46

• 就事論事就好辦 :-) -雲易- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 17:01:31

• 讓我感到很不安的是有人跟你的貼竟然否定九一一的真實存在，否則時間早已經撫平我內心的傷痛。望諒解 -金筆- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 18:04:30

• 不走極端，尊重事實就好辦。大多數質疑官方報道的恰恰是處於對死者的尊重 -雲易- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 18:13:52

• 它這裏說的是發現了一些灰燼需要很高的溫度產生，但不是普遍現象。就我目眼看到的，燃燒是很局限在被撞部位，因此不排除局部高溫 -金筆- ♂ (590 bytes) () 09/12/2023 postreply 18:38:15

• 你想明白了就好。我就想不通。看到這些專家們得分析也覺得很有道理。他們比我這個外行懂得多得多。 -雲易- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/13/2023 postreply 06:49:20