I noticed that his attitude towards AI could be the otherwise or would be the otherwise in the future. He provided no thoroughly consistent logic and deeper value to support his AI comments. There is arbitrariness in him. Therefore he meets a major criterion for 忽悠 .
有段時間很佩服馬斯克,後來發覺是忽悠,正由於 AI .
所有跟帖:
• 我覺得“arbitrariness”很對。沒特別關注這個人,好像他挺靈的,不就是arbitrariness嗎。就看他 -dhyang_wxc- ♂ (29 bytes) () 08/25/2023 postreply 20:45:43
• 抗議如此定義我偶像馬斯克!老馬是個有理想的同誌。也許就不是地球人,火星來的,好伐?哈哈 -盈盈一笑間- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2023 postreply 05:25:26
• 你們兩個是上海人? -雪晶- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2023 postreply 14:27:17
• 好伐,是吳語。不僅僅是上海話。:) -盈盈一笑間- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/27/2023 postreply 19:04:13