還有就是我粗淺的觀察，西醫很缺乏自己的理論。它的功效其實來自其它學科的加持。

for instance, physics and engineering gave x-ray and the MRI machines, biology gave genetic theory and so on. It is like a pond into which so many branches of sciences converge. But where is its own view of its object (the human physiology)?

Chinese medicine has a consistent and well developed theory for itself but never enjoyed this privilege as to receive supports from other sciences. No wonder it can be very lame at times.

Chinese medicine should feel free and comfortable to capitalize the MRI machines, the genetic theory and so on.

 

所有跟帖： 

• 西醫缺乏理論？您可真是什麽都敢說啊；當然，樓下還有“西醫也不是一無是處”這種奇聞怪談 -jinjiaodw- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 19:00:21

• 人家也會覺得你是奇談怪論，少見多怪。 -為人父- ♂ (167 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 19:06:37

• 也就你和那幾位這麽認為，拚命想把水攪混沒意義 -jinjiaodw- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 19:20:18

• 你說, 他們幹嘛攪混水? 想摸大魚還是摸大西瓜 : )) -鈴蘭聽風- ♀ (0 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 20:02:08

• 小謝, 你知道嗎? 畢業離開校園後, 西醫學院的醫生很快就進入臨床實踐, 獨擋一麵; 中醫學院的醫生, 從生澀到成熟 -鈴蘭聽風- ♀ (42 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 20:05:30

• 所以我說取消中醫學院，跟班老中醫是最好的成才途徑 -dancingwolf- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/14/2023 postreply 20:39:11