Just chanced upon this video, from about 30:00 and on, "懦夫陷阱" and the hawk-and-dove dilemma describe this recent event from the point of view of 博弈論 (game theory). One shouldn't always be a hawk, neither should one always be a dove.
Just chanced upon this video, from about 30:00 and on, "懦夫陷阱" and the hawk-and-dove dilemma describe this recent event from the point of view of 博弈論 (game theory). One shouldn't always be a hawk, neither should one always be a dove.
• 哈哈,整個聽了一遍。儒家經典是很厲害的!簡潔,擲地有聲!老太走台灣什麽意思? -applebee3- ♀ (0 bytes) () 08/10/2022 postreply 18:51:57
• 又,約1:15處起:以搏弈論的觀點,孔子的以德報德,以直報怨,是中國對美搏弈的最佳策略。。 -中間小謝- ♂ (101 bytes) () 08/10/2022 postreply 19:19:56
• 感覺這邏輯不太通。不說國際事務了,簡單點說單單就文化,教導對象,內容,表達方式都不同,很難適用。當然教導的美德 -applebee3- ♀ (68 bytes) () 08/10/2022 postreply 21:09:26
• 這是搏弈論作為一種數學理論得出的結論,無關文化。 -中間小謝- ♂ (158 bytes) () 08/10/2022 postreply 21:54:11
• 這或許揭示了中國文明之所以長存至今的一個原因:它本有的策略(儒家)是合符搏弈論給出的最優解的。 -中間小謝- ♂ (197 bytes) () 08/10/2022 postreply 22:02:51