說是法律的先例，代表不能推翻？憲法都能修正啊

Precedent is “the anchor of the law” and “the starting point” for a judge, Gorsuch said during his hearing. However, “there are instances when a court may appropriately overrule precedent after considering a lot of factors,” he added. 

Gorsuch was also asked if Roe v. Wade had “super precedent.” Gorsuch refused to say the case has “super precedent” and instead said the decision has been “reaffirmed many times.”

 

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/may/05/don-beyer/yes-trump-justices-said-roe-v-wade-was-precedent-c/

https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/verify/scotus-verify/what-justices-gorsuch-barrett-kavanaugh-said-roe-v-wade-confirmation-hearings/536-cdc8cbaa-cf81-4db9-a861-05ea5fbcb05a

 

 

所有跟帖： 

• 拜托你一字一句讀一下英文吧！這些如何與egregious wrong from the start 聯係起來？請解釋一下 -alwaysluck- ♀ (149 bytes) () 05/06/2022 postreply 13:49:43