在文中我特別加了一段些這個區別。
關於兒童虐待，美國的調查數據的標準就和中國不一樣。如果按美國的要求，中國的比例就不知道會有多驚人了。要知道孝道和兒童虐待之間的（非直接）關係，如有興趣，可以看我的“孝道與兒童虐待”一文。
如果你認為我那篇上書國際兒童保護組織的英文信是僅僅用了6六個例子就得出結論，你可能根本沒有讀那篇文章。我現在把其中的一段拷貝在此：
“The real horror behind these astonishing crimes is not only how brutal they were, but also the fact that they were not committed underground. All these sample cases were more or less known to neighborhoods, condemned by some people even in the media, yet they were still not stopped. The first case (Li Su, 1993) was reported in newspapers several times, but Li Su was nonetheless left alone until she paid the ultimate price. All these examples reveal a fact, that child abuse, especially family child abuse in China is not well recognized by society and not effectively supervised and punished by the law. Children in China who suffer from family abuse are not properly protected, and we could even say, based on the cases above, those children were not protected at all. ”
我想，任何一個在美國生活過多年的人，都會知道，這樣的例子（一個12歲的女孩子被父母用燒紅的火鉗烙遍全身，出逃後到了公安局又被送回父母手中），根本不可發生在美國 ！
說我寫文章是藝術家的想向，缺乏思辨，那大概是你的有色眼睛，因為你已經知道我是藝術家。在我的身份沒有暴露之前，沒有任何一個人拿“藝術”說事（並且如果我偶爾談藝術還立即有人站出來說這不是我的本行，勸我回去繼續搞“文化研究”。哈哈。）。至於思辨，我自己非常清楚自己的能力在那個水準上。
