not necessarily true, though :)

來源: Smart 於 2015-01-25 21:02:43 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (251 bytes)

these two factors reversely correlated.

Anyway, not sure how to get iq is in 1%. Going to Harvard mainly because of b-ball, not necessarily due to iq. Nothing is wrong with that, but just do not necessarily agree with iq statement.

所有跟帖： 

• 他的sat分數屬於top1%。 -soccermom- ♀ 給 soccermom 發送悄悄話 soccermom 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2015 postreply 21:21:34

• thanks for letting me know. SAT =\= iq, -Smart- ♂ 給 Smart 發送悄悄話 (18 bytes) () 01/25/2015 postreply 21:23:41

• sat 的原始設計是針對IQ的。 -soccermom- ♀ 給 soccermom 發送悄悄話 soccermom 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 01/25/2015 postreply 21:39:21

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！