JH lost to Pete in the last 2 years, not the first 2 years.

Here is the trick. JH had great results right away, which is actually very bad. They didn't have good picks when you did well.

PP and Seahawks did poorly in the first couple of years and they got the good picks and built up the team.

And Seahawks made some very good picks in late rounds while 9ers throws away one whole years(2012?), nobody really play from that class).

I have to say, I was surprised by how Pete and Seahawks have dominated JH and 9ers in the last 2 years, consider what had happened with Stanford and USC.

所有跟帖： 

• JH不是輸在球員的talents, 而是他選了Keap，和給了他好的合同。 -talkatwxc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/02/2015 postreply 11:51:58

• Gm signs contracts，not coach. -baydad- ♂ (180 bytes) () 01/02/2015 postreply 12:16:36

• 因為他力挺。總的來說這化學問題就是教練的問題，大學隊比較好搞一點。 -talkatwxc- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/02/2015 postreply 12:28:33

• I would say, even last year, 9ers n Seahawks r dead even -baydad- ♂ (315 bytes) () 01/02/2015 postreply 12:41:17