大家對這樣的觀點怎麽看？進攻和防守哪個重要？

Asked Byron about getting team more involved (vs. just Kobe) on the offensive end: "Don't even care about it (offense) right now."

— Serena Winters (@SerenaWinters) November 17, 2014

這麽注重防守的教練，不在乎科比不防守，不在乎Hill隻搶前場板不管後場板，不在乎布澤爾防守隻會推人犯規。。。 到底應該是進攻帶動防守，還是防守帶動進攻呢？

所有跟帖： 

• 看來教練也很固執。問題是你也得有會防守的料呀。 -tscb- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/16/2014 postreply 21:20:49

• 沒有防守，就湖人這群鐵匠，，， -萬綠叢中- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/16/2014 postreply 21:21:00

• 我是覺得教練賞罰不分明，不僅管不住科比，連Hill和Boozer也管不住 -事兒- ♀ (613 bytes) () 11/16/2014 postreply 21:34:29

• 湖人惡性循環就和體壇的辯論一個節奏 -tscb- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/16/2014 postreply 21:43:18

• 我覺得現在不是戰術或者係統的問題，而是徹底沒有精氣神 -Warsteiner- ♂ (1024 bytes) () 11/16/2014 postreply 21:47:31

• Kobe sits and team begins to fight, as simple as that. And he kn -ezf- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/16/2014 postreply 22:04:10

• Really? What was the fighting results? 0-2? -Warsteiner- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/16/2014 postreply 22:08:22

• 說句公道話，fight 還是fight 了的，不過主要是各人刷分， 不像一個team.再說fight不一定就一定會贏球， 實在是 -majhong- ♂ (0 bytes) () 11/17/2014 postreply 12:30:25