Bush is so much better than Parsons.

來源: Warsteiner 於 2014-04-15 13:58:55 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (373 bytes)
回答: but we are only talking the 3rd star 由 ans 於 2014-04-15 13:55:33

His role is reduced at Heat, and he's probably passed his prime. But he was a 20-10 guy, when opposing teams throwing best defender at him. Does anyone game plan against Parsons?

3rd guy doesn't automatically equal to 3rd star. Only a few teams have ever had Big 3, like Spurs, Heat, Celtics. Don't you think Manu or Rondo >> Parsons?

所有跟帖： 

• Disagree -ans- ♂ 給 ans 發送悄悄話 ans 的博客首頁 (226 bytes) () 04/15/2014 postreply 14:08:52

• Wasn't talking about now. Was comparing 3rd star at prime. -Warsteiner- ♂ 給 Warsteiner 發送悄悄話 Warsteiner 的博客首頁 (125 bytes) () 04/15/2014 postreply 14:20:05

• Bush was/is a Dirk copy. -過- ♂ 給 過 發送悄悄話 過 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 04/15/2014 postreply 14:10:44

• 他不如Dirk吧？ -baydad- ♂ 給 baydad 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 04/15/2014 postreply 14:17:53

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！