數據顯示，昨天的球就輸在幾個替補身上

This data taken from Popcornmachin's Game Flows should halp clarify which players Blew the game. The game was obviously lost in the fourth Quarter.

Player time on floor in 4th +/- 4th Q

Asik 2:43 -6
Garcia 2:43 -6
Lin 2:43 -6
Casspi 2:43 -6

Patrick Beverly 10:17 -15
Chandler Parsons 9:16 -11
James Harden 9:16 -11
Terrence Jones 9:08 -9
Dwight Howad 9:10 -11

Poor defense, that is the answer!

Fourth QTR break down:

The first coupe of minutes till 09:17

Mavericks 3/6 (FG 50%)

After 09:17 (that is when all bench players were replaced by starters)

Mavericks 10 / 11 (FG 90.9%)

所有跟帖： 

• 數據顯示：被窩裏上了３0分鍾以上的３場，３場全輸。還是首發來的厲害。 -toosad- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2013 postreply 11:18:42

• 輸吧，不輸到扒褲子典當的份上是不會有變化的。在冰箱手下火箭成不了大氣候。 -soccermom- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2013 postreply 11:30:03

• 9:17，冰箱不得不喊了暫停 -鋼絲.- ♂ (203 bytes) () 11/21/2013 postreply 11:20:22

• 如題，所以昨天輸球是這幾個替補的責任，與冰箱的指揮和首發的狀態無關。 -馬馬甲甲- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2013 postreply 11:25:43

• 當然，就怪小林沒進球，火箭輸都是林的錯。 -soccermom- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/21/2013 postreply 11:32:11

• 小牛調整防守，對林的防守非常成功。３分鍾沒得分也隻是讓對手多得６分。替補好歹防了個５0％，主力防了多少？ -toosad- ♀ (99 bytes) () 11/21/2013 postreply 11:43:12