My point is very simple:
The problem is the compnents used, not the expression.
If we think using 並 戶 同 to form 扁豆, is a little to 碎, or not very neat as 竹杖 said, then no matter how well the 抱合 are provided, the problem remains.
On the other hand, if we accept the way of such re-construction, the expression in the 謎麵 is suffient!
Your comments were not to the right point.
The problem is the compnents used, not the expression.
If we think using 並 戶 同 to form 扁豆, is a little to 碎, or not very neat as 竹杖 said, then no matter how well the 抱合 are provided, the problem remains.
On the other hand, if we accept the way of such re-construction, the expression in the 謎麵 is suffient!
Your comments were not to the right point.