大家幫忙看看這個合同合理嗎？

雖然是法律相關，但涉及到狗狗，希望有經驗的人指點一下。

要把狗狗送去寄宿幾周，對方要求簽免責合同。該公司聲稱有保險，fully bonded。但合同裏有以下兩條：

If the pet(s) become ill while under the care of ***, and medical care is needed in the best judgment of ***, Client authorizes *** to transport the pet(s) to Client s veterinarian (or one who is available). Client authorizes *** to approve any emergency treatment recommended by said veterinarian when the cost of treatment is within the limits authorized in a Veterinarian Release Form. Client authorizes *** to take Clients pet(s) to an Emergency Clinic For Animals when the Clients veterinarian is not immediately available. Client further agrees to promptly reimburse *** for any expenses incurred for any medical treatment or emergency care.

Client releases *** from all liability related to transportation, treatment, or expenses, resulting from any emergency or special needs as determined by ***.

 *** is the dog training company.

看以上條例，我的理解是，不管發生什麽事情，狗狗的醫療費都是主人承擔，對方沒有任何責任。那麽他們的保險是保什麽呢？如果是因為他們的疏忽，狗狗有什麽問題，簽了這個合同是不是意味著他們可以免責了？

第一次把狗狗放出去這麽長時間，不太放心，希望大家分享一下經驗。謝謝！

所有跟帖： 

• 每個pet boarding都有這種條款，沒的爭的。我覺的萬一真有事，還是可以區分責任的。就像人進手術室， -keeper- ♀ (130 bytes) () 07/03/2012 postreply 20:43:21

• 同意keeper媽媽的，一般的條例都是這樣的。他們保意外，一般保險公司也就賣給他們這種險 -羊脂玉淨瓶- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/04/2012 postreply 04:06:28

• 謝二位，以前去的那家沒要求簽，所以不清楚狀況。：） -沁園- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/04/2012 postreply 05:12:19

• 這裏邊有兩個鏈接，可能與你需要的信息有關 -Churchill- ♀ (622 bytes) () 07/03/2012 postreply 21:19:36

• 謝謝丘媽，今天就去找那本嘍羅書看，爭取當文化狗媽 -沁園- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/04/2012 postreply 05:16:18

• 好像挺正常的。我們每次出門都給vet說狗狗有事他們可以全權處理，費用當然是我們出了 -二狗娘- ♀ (33 bytes) () 07/04/2012 postreply 09:40:55

• 謝謝分享經驗。：） -沁園- ♀ (0 bytes) () 07/05/2012 postreply 19:20:48