For those who put your hope on Cain, WAKE UP!

來源: planojw 於 2011-10-18 12:36:21 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (641 bytes)

From the surface, 999 plan was very appealing.  It's nothing but smoke mirror.

999 plan said, "no tax loophole, everyone pays same %".  Cain changed his plan several times later:

1. If you were in economical harsh area, you should not pay 9%, you should pay less.

2. If the company is buying America, you can deduct tax.

...

These are new loopholes in my book!

Lawyers and accountants would fight against this plan furiously, so the chance of getting it passed in congress is close to 0.

What to be excited about if you know for sure it's plan will end up miscarried?!

所有跟帖： 

• We like 9.99, and we do not like Cain ! -SJSharks- ♂ 給 SJSharks 發送悄悄話 (106 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:40:10

• he really doesn't have a plan, just an idea to entertain :D -planojw- ♂ 給 planojw 發送悄悄話 planojw 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:41:12

• I know, I know. He does not have ground operations -SJSharks- ♂ 給 SJSharks 發送悄悄話 (388 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:45:41

• No another Black guy, period. For current Prz, GOP -wxc1204- ♂ 給 wxc1204 發送悄悄話 (180 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 14:01:12

• before rich and poor fight against this plan -用戶名被占用了- ♂ 給 用戶名被占用了 發送悄悄話 用戶名被占用了 的博客首頁 (49 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:45:13

• CPA will fight against it for sure :)))))) -Teaparty- ♀ 給 Teaparty 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:45:59

• no more tax CPA, no more tax lawyer. only auditor. -用戶名被占用了- ♂ 給 用戶名被占用了 發送悄悄話 用戶名被占用了 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:03:48

• Get rid of IRS and CPA. Be a liberatarian or tea bagger. -SJSharks- ♂ 給 SJSharks 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:57:59

• yes we can yes we can yes we can yes we can yes we can yes we ca -用戶名被占用了- ♂ 給 用戶名被占用了 發送悄悄話 用戶名被占用了 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:09:45

• At lease, it is a WAKE-UP call!:) -Teaparty- ♀ 給 Teaparty 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:47:42

• Go Cains, Go! 就愛搗亂 -虞美人懷古- ♀ 給 虞美人懷古 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:49:59

• Go Cains, Go 虞美人! Bu愛搗亂 -SJSharks- ♂ 給 SJSharks 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:52:03

• if there are ifs, there are work for lawyers and accountants -秋色滿院- ♀ 給 秋色滿院 發送悄悄話 秋色滿院 的博客首頁 (624 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 12:56:11

• 現在美國的問題是jobjobjob. 沒有job哪來tax？ -徒勞- ♂ 給 徒勞 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:27:28

• job is the whole idea of 999 plan -用戶名被占用了- ♂ 給 用戶名被占用了 發送悄悄話 用戶名被占用了 的博客首頁 (61 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:29:07

• does that mean bringing jobs back to US? I don't think so -徒勞- ♂ 給 徒勞 發送悄悄話 (69 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:33:45

• 我認為不會 -sts135- ♀ 給 sts135 發送悄悄話 (47 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:47:43

• 這隻是GOP的借口。我不覺得兩者有必然的聯係 -徒勞- ♂ 給 徒勞 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:45:41

• 工作始終會流向人工低的地方 -sts135- ♀ 給 sts135 發送悄悄話 (75 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:50:01

• Exactly -徒勞- ♂ 給 徒勞 發送悄悄話 (0 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 13:55:12

• Basic Economics: People create jobs because of market demand -SJSharks- ♂ 給 SJSharks 發送悄悄話 (129 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 14:01:06

• 額外的demand哪裏來？ -sts135- ♀ 給 sts135 發送悄悄話 (149 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 14:19:08

• 沒有額外的demand企業就不會創造新的就業機會. -SJSharks- ♂ 給 SJSharks 發送悄悄話 (125 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 15:06:58

• 但是，美國的現實是，就算你有tax break，工作還是外流。 -sts135- ♀ 給 sts135 發送悄悄話 (248 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 15:34:37

• 可以很明確的告訴你，不是所有企業都無限製的壓榨工人。 -SJSharks- ♂ 給 SJSharks 發送悄悄話 (104 bytes) () 10/18/2011 postreply 16:10:08

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！