Some of your claims are inaccurate

來源: cheerleaders 2011-07-09 20:02:33 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (2078 bytes)
回答: 關於中美比較的一些個人觀點.lilly8882011-07-09 19:11:02

First of all, trying to predict the future based on past performance is a fundamental logical flaw; supposing that the United States has never suffered any protracted economic downturn, it would nevertheless be logically unjustifiable to imply that it never will. And the United States has had prolonged periods of economic difficulty, the most notable of which was the Great Depression in the late 1920s and 1930s; it was only able to recover because of World War II. Going back further, during the 1870s the Long Depression, although less severe, was, as the name implies, a long period of stagnation and little growth.

On the topic of the United States' natural resources, the United States has already exhausted much of its available resources. Most continental oil reserves have been depleted, and coal reserves are becoming increasingly difficult to access, so the United States has had to look to foreign sources of fuel. Of course, the only reason it has such easy access to Arabian oil is through territorial aggression: case in point, consider that the United States has attacked Libya, which has oil reserves, and has not attacked Syria, which has perpetrated similar crimes against humanity and does not have oil reserves.

Furthermore, saying that Russia remains economically vibrant due to its natural resources is simply not a correct statement. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia has experienced negative population growth and frequently negative economic growth; it was this sluggish economy that toppled the presidency of Boris Yeltsin. Russia now is nowhere as strong as the Soviet Union used to be, and is inarguably weaker than China. In an interesting turn of history, with the retirement of the last NASA space shuttle, the United States space program is now entirely dependent... on Russia.

This is not to say that it will not be a long time until China surpasses the United States; China surely has institutional problems that it must address. However, the reasons that you gave are not the reasons for this.

所有跟帖: 

Peer reviewed. -planojw- 給 planojw 發送悄悄話 planojw 的博客首頁 (0 bytes) () 07/09/2011 postreply 20:17:08

回複:Some of your claims are inaccurate -lilly888- 給 lilly888 發送悄悄話 lilly888 的博客首頁 (3227 bytes) () 07/09/2011 postreply 20:24:11

好! -planojw- 給 planojw 發送悄悄話 planojw 的博客首頁 (26 bytes) () 07/09/2011 postreply 20:28:45

回複:回複:Some of your claims are inaccurate -ERommel- 給 ERommel 發送悄悄話 ERommel 的博客首頁 (754 bytes) () 07/10/2011 postreply 06:27:54

老貓的洋文是很給力。 -ERommel- 給 ERommel 發送悄悄話 ERommel 的博客首頁 (66 bytes) () 07/10/2011 postreply 06:38:32

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”