that is really stupid

Only idiots can think this way:

         問題嚴重的 ===> keep him at the same position (不是立即處分) 

         問題輕微的 ====> 可以處理

Read what you posted yourself:

調查組認為被調查的黨員幹部確犯有嚴重錯誤，已不適宜擔任現任職務或妨礙案件調查時，可建議對其采取停職檢查措施。

Do you understand your own post: 采取停職檢查措施 ?

所有跟帖： 

• 斷章取義, 可建議對其采取停職檢查措施。 -hillhawkus- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 20:49:11

• the 建議 is apparently taken. -abcdef654321- ♂ (41 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 20:59:15

• 所以, 立案在前, 然後建議, 處分在最後. 看明白次序了? -hillhawkus- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:02:18

• I will say it again (copied from my early post) -abcdef654321- ♂ (243 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:07:14

• 哎............................................ -hillhawkus- ♂ (0 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:08:37

• OK, I am wrong -abcdef654321- ♂ (669 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 22:29:05

• 初步調查 => sacked => 立案調查 -abcdef654321- ♂ (184 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:09:45

• 原貼中的[初步調查]是指, 立案之後的調查組[初步調查]. 不要跟立案之前的[初步核實], -hillhawkus- ♂ (99 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 21:19:55

• OK, you are right, -abcdef654321- ♂ (776 bytes) () 04/10/2012 postreply 22:15:36