我覺得這就是殲10的正確描述

F-16 is a proven platform. The performance could be verified by the third party, as F-16 exported to many oversea customers, Gripen also has its buyers.

F-2 is a licensed variant of F-16 with some improvements, or it’s considered as F-16 customized by Japan.

J-10 is a non proven design, no oversea buyers, the Lavi design which they told that J-10 based on, isn’t the non proven design as well.

So who can compare those ?

所有跟帖： 

• 不好意思，此乃轉發，中立的做法。 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:41:18

• 鏈接呢？ -thrawn- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 11:46:42

• 我看了一下，這裏應該不用with, 嗬嗬 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:42:58

• 太中國了, 嗬嗬 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 05:57:07

• who can compare J-10 with those (F-16 and F-2) -bluesky231- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:55:23

• 顯然他不清楚作者要表達什麽意思 -bluesky231- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 04:05:46

• 不用with -鬆濤孤雁- ♂ (59 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 05:14:29

• 要實事求是，別像武術一樣吹牛。一打就暴了，然後就說沒發內功怕傷了對方，：） -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:40:10

• 牆外沒人在乎這個, 結果等比了再說。 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 03:49:12

• 這一句 “the Lavi design ... isn’t the non proven design as well." 似 -欲千北- ♂ (174 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 04:38:52

• 作者的意思是, Lavi都不是, 何況10 -xsing- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 05:52:27

• 雖然知道作者的意思但其英文都亂寫把is a寫成isn't the -thrawn- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 11:50:35

• +100 -欲千北- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 14:27:29

• I don’t know nothing about this -BeyondWind- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 15:28:47

• Lavi 後麵那個they指代不明吧 -telljoke- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 06:58:27

• Lavi是以色列用F16改進而來的而J10是中國用Lavi改進而來的。J10的確沒打過仗是難證明，隻能用旁證。 -thrawn- ♂ (0 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 11:53:33

• 嗬嗬，看來，兩岸的J10和F16V，不交手，這些無厘頭的吵架，還會沒完沒了。 -吃素的狼- ♀ (237 bytes) () 01/01/2020 postreply 16:20:25