因為您們的離婚案件已經判決,所以在法律上來說您與她的關係可以視為是兩個沒有關係的陌生人,所以這麼說,您家隔壁的阿大可不可以未經您的允許開啟您的郵件,答覆是當然不可以. 所以對於她,在法律上的規範也是如此,她可以將郵件轉交給您也可以退回給原寄件人,但是她無權open您個人的郵件,或是甚至於cash寄給您的支票.
事實上她的行為已經觸犯了聯邦郵務法中的郵務詐欺罪 (mail fraud)
相關的資料在這裡
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_fraud
您可以做的是與銀行聯繫取得對方deposit the check 的紀錄, 同時請寄件人提供您一個資料有關這封信與支票是給予您的,將這兩個資料一併提供給,USPS Ispector General Office
URL
http://www.uspsoig.gov/
他們自然會調查這個案件. 簡單的說如果最終聯邦檢察官決定起訴這個案件,她麵對的是每一項控罪(每拆一封信是一項控罪)最高五年的刑期,所以您個人的權益是受到法律保障的.
回複:Can wife open/take husband's mail
所有跟帖:
•
Thank you laomao, we are not officially divorced yet
-EXu-
♂
(303 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:32:01
•
Do you have a temporary order?
-Aidanmom-
♀
(109 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:34:26
•
No, i do not have such order.
-EXu-
♂
(48 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:36:51
•
I still don't think it's legal for her to do that.
-AidanMom-
♀
(151 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:48:34
•
that's why i think she's stupid
-EXu-
♂
(0 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:50:20
•
she doesn't need a signature to deposit money
-ne0987-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
15:19:49
•
BTW, will this be a good idea?
-EXu-
♂
(368 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:34:05
•
Talk to your lawyer first.
-AidanMom-
♀
(90 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:35:52
•
that's a very bad idea if both of you already
-認栽了-
♀
(218 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:41:44
•
this is what I think: we do not have too much asset
-EXu-
♂
(337 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
13:49:48
•
stop saying she's stupid, especially when you think
-結婚十年-
♀
(833 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
14:01:38
•
you are right.
-EXu-
♂
(92 bytes)
()
06/08/2009 postreply
14:13:05