因為您們的離婚案件已經判決,所以在法律上來說您與她的關係可以視為是兩個沒有關係的陌生人,所以這麼說,您家隔壁的阿大可不可以未經您的允許開啟您的郵件,答覆是當然不可以. 所以對於她,在法律上的規範也是如此,她可以將郵件轉交給您也可以退回給原寄件人,但是她無權open您個人的郵件,或是甚至於cash寄給您的支票.
事實上她的行為已經觸犯了聯邦郵務法中的郵務詐欺罪 (mail fraud)
相關的資料在這裡
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_fraud
您可以做的是與銀行聯繫取得對方deposit the check 的紀錄, 同時請寄件人提供您一個資料有關這封信與支票是給予您的,將這兩個資料一併提供給,USPS Ispector General Office
URL
http://www.uspsoig.gov/
他們自然會調查這個案件. 簡單的說如果最終聯邦檢察官決定起訴這個案件,她麵對的是每一項控罪(每拆一封信是一項控罪)最高五年的刑期,所以您個人的權益是受到法律保障的.
回複:Can wife open/take husband's mail
所有跟帖:
• Thank you laomao, we are not officially divorced yet -EXu- ♂ (303 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:32:01
• Do you have a temporary order? -Aidanmom- ♀ (109 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:34:26
• No, i do not have such order. -EXu- ♂ (48 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:36:51
• I still don't think it's legal for her to do that. -AidanMom- ♀ (151 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:48:34
• that's why i think she's stupid -EXu- ♂ (0 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:50:20
• she doesn't need a signature to deposit money -ne0987- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 15:19:49
• BTW, will this be a good idea? -EXu- ♂ (368 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:34:05
• Talk to your lawyer first. -AidanMom- ♀ (90 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:35:52
• that's a very bad idea if both of you already -認栽了- ♀ (218 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:41:44
• this is what I think: we do not have too much asset -EXu- ♂ (337 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 13:49:48
• stop saying she's stupid, especially when you think -結婚十年- ♀ (833 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 14:01:38
• you are right. -EXu- ♂ (92 bytes) () 06/08/2009 postreply 14:13:05