I thought quasi-in-rem jurisdiction is gone

來源: caliber 2009-02-11 08:56:03 [] [博客] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (127 bytes)
回答: 有可能,但要查B州的 venue 條例caliber2009-02-10 20:05:16
based on the Shaffer v. Heitner (1977). You need minimum contact even in quasi-in-rem action.

Is that not the case?
請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”