是關於pain and suffering settlement.
也許我沒說清楚
所有跟帖:
•
無論是保險公司賠你的車錢還是保險公司賠你的人身方麵的錢
-戰車上的狸花-
♀
(320 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
12:43:49
•
解釋得真清楚。謝謝!
-JuneJune-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
13:30:02
•
can you point to the IRS Reg. that says so?
-caliber-
♂
(1037 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
15:33:32
•
another more realistic example
-caliber-
♂
(479 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
15:42:52
•
可以看這裏
-戰車上的狸花-
♀
(882 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
21:59:32
•
that is not the law
-caliber-
♂
(550 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
22:20:38
•
唉。IRS是對GROSS INCOME 征稅的。如果你要弄清楚
-戰車上的狸花-
♀
(400 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
23:09:04
•
我確實是為了較汁兒而較汁兒, 為了絞湖而絞湖
-caliber-
♂
(591 bytes)
()
11/04/2008 postreply
09:47:15
•
A correction: not all punitive payments are non-taxable.
-如塵-
♀
(0 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
15:44:24
•
And not all compensatory damage is non-taxable either
-caliber-
♂
(99 bytes)
()
11/03/2008 postreply
15:47:36