回複:回複:你沒看清楚, PUB 54是FOR 公民或者RA, 太太根本不是RA

來源: bigass 2006-04-12 16:16:09 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀: 次 (583 bytes)
I DISAGREE. WHY US GOV DESIGN SUCH A TAX BREAK DEVICE AS FOREIGN EARNED INCOME EXCLUSION? TO AVOID DOUBLE TAX! IF THE COUPLE ARE BOTH US CITIZENS AND ONE WORKS ABROAD ALL YEAR LONG AND THUS QUALIFIES FOR THAT, R U TELLING ME HE/SHE WILL NOT GET THE EXCLUSION BECAUSE OF THIS "SOLE" TAX HOME BULLSHIIT? I DON'T BELIEVE THAT. GET ME THE QUOTE AND THEN I'LL BELIEVE! LET ME TELL U THIS, IF A US CITIZEN CAN DO IT, THEN AN RA OR "TREATED-AS" RA CAN SURE DO IT, UNLESS A QUOTE FROM THE CODE IS AVAILABLE!!! THAT'S THE MOST BASIC RULE OF US TAX LAWS!!!
NOW GIVE ME YOUR QUOTE!!!

所有跟帖: 

朋友, COOL DOWN, IRS的條款是專門為一些特別 -stp- 給 stp 發送悄悄話 (304 bytes) () 04/12/2006 postreply 22:04:45

請您先登陸,再發跟帖!

發現Adblock插件

如要繼續瀏覽
請支持本站 請務必在本站關閉/移除任何Adblock

關閉Adblock後 請點擊

請參考如何關閉Adblock/Adblock plus

安裝Adblock plus用戶請點擊瀏覽器圖標
選擇“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安裝Adblock用戶請點擊圖標
選擇“don't run on pages on this domain”