回複:回複:你沒看清楚, PUB 54是FOR 公民或者RA, 太太根本不是RA

來源: 2006-04-12 16:16:09 [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 本文已被閱讀:

I DISAGREE. WHY US GOV DESIGN SUCH A TAX BREAK DEVICE AS FOREIGN EARNED INCOME EXCLUSION? TO AVOID DOUBLE TAX! IF THE COUPLE ARE BOTH US CITIZENS AND ONE WORKS ABROAD ALL YEAR LONG AND THUS QUALIFIES FOR THAT, R U TELLING ME HE/SHE WILL NOT GET THE EXCLUSION BECAUSE OF THIS "SOLE" TAX HOME BULLSHIIT? I DON'T BELIEVE THAT. GET ME THE QUOTE AND THEN I'LL BELIEVE! LET ME TELL U THIS, IF A US CITIZEN CAN DO IT, THEN AN RA OR "TREATED-AS" RA CAN SURE DO IT, UNLESS A QUOTE FROM THE CODE IS AVAILABLE!!! THAT'S THE MOST BASIC RULE OF US TAX LAWS!!!
NOW GIVE ME YOUR QUOTE!!!