Inspector liability

Im a real estate transaction, a seller hired an inspector and did an inspection for the house. The buyer does not hire his own inspector and just based on the sellers report to accept the house and closed the transaction.

Later the buyer find a few defacts that need to hire a third party to repair (after warrenty time). He like to sure the inspector for the reason that the defects should be found during inspection but the inspector missed.

Question: Can the existing owner sue the inspector. Is the inspector liable to the existing owner. He was hired by the seller not the owner.

Please help.

所有跟帖： 

• doesn't matter who hired inspector, he's not -jojo1971- ♀ (20 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 08:49:52

• Then, why does an inspector need to buy -煤格- ♂ (133 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 09:28:16

• NO, 看看檢查報告的聲明. -stp- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 10:43:30

• This is just like practice of medical doctors ... -煤格- ♂ (406 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 11:38:30

• Not necessarily -66196- ♀ (864 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 13:13:54

• Thanks, More help wanted -autumnmoon- ♀ (444 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 18:07:43

• Yes, you can still sue the inspector -68156- ♀ (879 bytes) () 12/08/2005 postreply 21:05:21