回複：res ipsa loquitur

來源: 66196 於 2005-12-07 07:53:43 [] [舊帖] [給我悄悄話] 閱讀數 : (452 bytes)
本帖於 2006-01-03 08:15:59 時間, 由普通用戶 stp 編輯
回答: 回複：我兒子也在BABY　GAP摔倒 由 68156 於 2005-12-06 22:08:05

You are right. RIL is a substitute to circumstantial evidence that will allow the jury to infer Gap's negligence. The jury can choose to infer or not infer. If they infer, they must bring a plaintiff verdict. The exclusive control, however, is refered to the injurious instrument, not the victim. In this case, it would be the floor. What it means is, Gap does the floor mopping/cleaning itself and no other person can alter the floor condition.

所有跟帖： 

• about control -68106- ♀ 給 68106 發送悄悄話 (331 bytes) () 12/07/2005 postreply 16:36:42

請您先登陸，再發跟帖！