If his exwife wants to take re

sponsibility of the bill, what you said is right. But now it is her hu*****and's responsibility and he has a job and money. Unless 1.)The ex takes all the bill over
2)The hu*****and apply for bankrupcy, then they won't need to pay the bill. Just my opnion

所有跟帖： 

• 如果他們cancel了前妻的保險,前期也可以通過這些途徑 -取得治療- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2005 postreply 00:10:03

• 離婚協議上寫著要繼續保留保險,憑什麽取消 -要承擔協議,人要象人- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2005 postreply 05:33:19

• 那他現妻生孩子的一二萬你給出??他前妻不用他的保險也可以 -得到治療,你為什麽不- ♀ (180 bytes) () 06/02/2005 postreply 12:00:41

• Then better hire a big lawyer -howcome- ♀ (85 bytes) () 06/02/2005 postreply 14:29:40

• 不但贏不了,還會有損這對夫妻的聲譽 -如果她們還有聲譽的話- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2005 postreply 17:10:12

• 他們應該找律師問問現在cancel來得來不及 -不會花多少谘詢費- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2005 postreply 22:32:40

• 律師一定要有官司打才能賺錢的,一定會支持打官司. -小閑- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2005 postreply 01:22:38

• 明明是丈夫小氣不舍得買兩份保險,既然協議有寫就應該做 -沒聽說保險要一萬二- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2005 postreply 17:07:25

• 現在談的是現狀如何解決 -你說的管P用- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/02/2005 postreply 22:34:08

• 不就是花錢買保險嗎,好象不認識字一樣,粗人 -你是女人在說話嗎- ♀ (0 bytes) () 06/03/2005 postreply 00:55:07

• 看完了,覺得很可怕 -小閑- ♀ (141 bytes) () 06/03/2005 postreply 01:31:07

• 人粗理不粗,你小人管我男女.現在買保險來得及嗎? 知道保險生 -效期嗎?孩子馬上要生- ♀ (39 bytes) () 06/05/2005 postreply 02:32:12